It seems like Kimber was good quality, then bad quality, then good quality. I’m considering buying a new Kimber. Any say on if Kimber has their stuff together now or am I going to be sending this back to Kimber in 6 weeks?
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
^^^^^All style, little substance
Way better options available
Most of the Kimbers I’ve owned were purchased more than 20 years ago when Kimber was considered the “must have“ production 1911. The last Kimber I bought was a Pro CDP II, over a decade ago. I don’t know when Kimber’s reputation took a downturn, but I’ve generally had a good experience with them. I bought a Gold Combat in 2001 that performed as well as many of my higher-end 1911s. Whatever issues Kimber had, I hope they’re sorted if you decide to buy one. What model are you considering?
What’s good about them? The abundance of MIM parts or the fact that they charge forged part money for some of their models?Kimber makes good quality firearms.
Their base guns are nice guns for people wanting a 1911 with entry level upgrades without a big price tag and this isn't going to be their primary gun.What’s good about them? The abundance of MIM parts or the fact that they charge forged part money for some of their models?
I think their base guns are a decent option, but the more expensive models are just ridiculous. Dan Wesson is a much better quality pistol in that price range.
I agree the base guns are the way to go with Kimber.Their base guns are nice guns for people wanting a 1911 with entry level upgrades without a big price tag and this isn't going to be their primary gun.
As LAV says if you treat your gun like most people treat a lawn mower, get a Glock.
If someone has a budget of $1,500-$2,200 Dan Wesson is probably the best option in 1911s.Dan Wesson is a much better quality pistol in that price range.