Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

Why Gen 4 Now Law Enforcement Only ?

1 reading
47K views 61 replies 42 participants last post by  Grannyglock19  
#1 ·
Like the title states - why such a move by Glock that new Gen 4's can only be purchased by Law Enforcement personnel ? Gen 4's are my favorite series , so not happy about this new Glock policy .
 
#3 ·
They're not law enforcement only. There's just a Law Enforcement Only version of certain models with its own SKU number, same as other generations. These are the blue label guns and are mostly exactly the same as the non-blue label, but have an extra magazine in the box. Oddly enough, comparing the civilian and law enforcement versions of the Gen 4 G34, there is a 2mm difference in barrel length and overall length?????


 
#51 ·
That’s a possibility though every dealer I know of asks for credentials for the blue label Glocks at blue label price. I know of dealers that sold blue label pistols at regular price to non-qualifyied buyers because they were sold out of the regular label model. Also know a ton of guys who buy them blue label and sell them NIB for a good deal but they’re making money on the transaction.
 
#8 ·
The way I read that is they still have some blue label inventory - perharps because of certain agencies still wanting to buy them. Otherwise they have gone all Gen5. So if you have a GSSF coupon and your local deater has some you should still be able to buy. It's interesting though that the 23 Gen 4 is still available when the 23 Gen 5 is out. Probably old new stock still in inventory. The only reason they still make Gen3 is because California.
 
#13 ·
I don't blame Glock for attempting to trim their product line. As already noted, gen 3 for California and gen 5 as Glock's main/current focus. I can see LE agencies purchasing gen 4 on an individual replacement basis but I bet any agency looking to replace their entire stock of Glocks and considering either the gen 4 or gen 5, Glock would be pushing their usually very generous discounts for the gen 5s only.

I prognosticate that in the coming years, there will be plenty of gen 4 police trade ins... carried much, shot minimally, reasonably priced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadhead
#54 ·
I don't blame Glock for attempting to trim their product line. As already noted, gen 3 for California and gen 5 as Glock's main/current focus. I can see LE agencies purchasing gen 4 on an individual replacement basis but I bet any agency looking to replace their entire stock of Glocks and considering either the gen 4 or gen 5, Glock would be pushing their usually very generous discounts for the gen 5s only.

I prognosticate that in the coming years, there will be plenty of gen 4 police trade ins... carried much, shot minimally, reasonably priced.
My department just replaced all of our G19/3s (purchased in 2010) with G45s. Before the G19s we had G22s and 23s (purchased in ~1999). We had a lot of problems with the G22/23s, especially with WMLs. No problems with the G19s. We really like the G45s. I got one of the first batches without the MOS but the majority are now MOS. I don’t personally like red dot sights but I also realize that I’m a dinosaur and I need to stand aside for the future.
 
#15 ·
Taking a scientific wilda** guess here, but I'd venture the only reason the previous gens are in production at all is so Glock can close out it's current contracts. Once those obligations have been met, other than used, they will disappear. New gen Glocks will never appear in California as I believe Glock and S&W both told them to pound sand. To get a new firearm on the "approved list", they were required to pay a fee and submit samples of the new weapon for approval and both refused to pay to play. I believe that whole thing started because Cali (and specifically LA County) had submitted a huge order of Gen 4's for law enforcement, which was exempt from the approved list thing, but wouldn't allow private citizens to own them. Glock cancelled the order stating if the guns weren't available to private citizens in their State, then under the same rules they wouldn't be available to law enforcement. There were a number of threads about this several years back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pebrad and jhc37013
#18 ·
A lot of California Law Enforcement carries Glock handguns of all generations. Glock does not turn down Law Enforcement sales and is very aggressive getting contracts. The main competitor to Glock in California is Sig. Glock tried very hard to get the Gen 4's on the safe list but could not. That did not stop any Law Enforcement sales. If Glock didn't manufacture Gen 3's many in California would not be able to purchase a Glock at all.
 
#25 ·
Old news.

Glock has been phasing out Gen 4 for over a year. Some Gen 4 are still made that isn't available in Gen 5 as 9mmdude has said, you can still get .45 ACP and 10mm Gen 4 Glocks. I bought a brand new 21.4 2-3 months ago, USA made. Unsure if they are domestic production only or still imported.
The find gen 3 pistols to be "okay" but the gen 4 pistols finally brought me into the glock fold... The gen 5s lost me again.
Do not want.
My Glock collection is done also at Gen 4. Will not have a Gen 5 either. I just don't see anything of value, so more are available with MOS - another trend I care not about.
 
#21 · (Edited)
Gen5's won't fit in some security holsters designed for previous generations. That makes it hard to rotate in new guns at large agencies without a large financial outlay for new holsters.

I have a security holster (Safarliland ALS) that would normally work with G22/23 and 17/19, but my new G45 won't fit. Pretty sure its the ambidextrous slide stop/release.

I bought a concealed carry ALS paddle for my G45 that also seems to work ok with my G19.4...which means it likely works with my G23.4
 
#27 ·
That’s a part of it. But some agencies require a “ torture test” of each gun model. Ours was 10,000 rounds of 124 grain+p gold dot . I don’t know how many test guns are used. Just the testing and approval by the firearms section, the police commissioner and the political review by the city council isn’t worth the hassle . And they buy enough guns on its own for Glock to keep a model line open as they did with the smith and Wesson 5946 for a few years. The NYPD has its officers buy approximately 2000 to 5000 Glock firearms every year. And the other city enforcement agencies like corrections, taxi and limo commission agents, sanitation police etc piggyback off the NYPD firearm selections.

And I say— let’s bring back the Gen 2.
And the Gen 3 had its advantages. The original tennifer treatment and a good finish that doesn’t scratch as easily as the Gen 4
 
#23 ·
A statement from GLOCK:

“In an effort to intelligently preserve and grow the GLOCK brand and deliver uncompromised quality and maximum customer satisfaction, we are focused on our mission of future-oriented manufacturing technologies. This includes extending the latest Gen5 technology enhancements to the .40 caliber line of pistols. Availability will begin in October; however, the focus will be on supporting existing .40 caliber agencies on transitioning to the latest technologies within the law enforcement market. While we will continue to support fielded Gen4 pistols and agencies with Gen4 models, we have stopped 9×19 and .40 caliber Gen4 productions for the US commercial market. We look forward to bringing the performance improvements of the Gen5 technologies to other areas of product development.”



Glock originally couldn't get the Gen4 guns on the CA Roster primarily because Glock doesn't offer a magazine safety. (This was stated during a Glock armorer recert after the gen4's were released.) The loaded chamber indicator requirements became very stringent at one point during the mess when CA was changing their mind about what was acceptable, too.

Then, once state AG Kamala Harris decided the state didn't have a patent issue with microstamping technology in 2013, she implemented the bill that had been passed and signed approx 7 years prior (2007). Once the previously signed microstamping bill was implemented, all new models had to incorporate it in order to be accepted onto the state's Roster ... which meant no more new models would ever be accepted onto the CA Roster. LE could continue to buy them new due to the peace officers exemption written into the code, of course. That essentially meant that all new handguns that had been legislatively declared "unsafe" by CA could only be bought new by LE, and they're carrying and using firearms in Public that have been legislatively declared by CA as being "unsafe". :ROFLMAO: If I understand it right, that's the crux of the challenge to the law that's been sitting and waiting in DC to be hopefully be heard by the Supreme Court ... someday.

 
#47 ·
The security holster issue is significant for LE agencies, as holsters are a significant expenditure. The ambi slide stop causes a problem with older holsters.

Gen4 represents a lineal connection to earlier generations of GLOCK handguns, and many LE agencies have legacy inventories of pistols and spare parts. Hence, they may wish to continue with Gen4 until most of their existing inventory his the seven year point (when night sights get dim, mags get tired, and pins and springs need replacement).

GLOCK offers a great LE agency trade-in program (roughly two old guns for one new gun). Gen5 has matured as a product in 9mm, and I’d feel comfortable transitioning at this point. Unfortunately, I received one of my new agency’s last Gen4 G19 pistols. I also retired from my LE career with a Gen4 G19. So, that’s where am for the foreseeable future. It isn’t a bad place to be at all, as Gen4 is well-proven, and has the benefits of the dual RSA. With Ameriglo Trooper sights, “M” backstrap, Pearce Frame Plug, and Glock OEM Extended Slide Stop Lever installed, the gun IS “perfect”. I just acquired a silver-slide G48, so I at least own a Gen5 Glock

I’m anxiously awaiting a Gen5 Glock 41. My G41.4 is perfectly good already, but I’d love a further-improved factory trigger and the “marksman” barrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Glock Talk
 
#58 ·
It's interesting to speculate if California's list is forcing Glock to continue producing both finger groove pistols (gen 3) and non-finger groove pistols (gen 5)? That is to say, if CA's list didn't exist, would Glock be only making gen 5 pistols today?

I prefer Glock producing both types (finger groove and non-finger groove) as that gives choices. But the finger grooved models should have changeable backstraps (ie: like gen 4s).