Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

Questions about Optic Cuts

2 reading
3.3K views 11 replies 11 participants last post by  Porterboy11b  
#1 ·
Hi all,

I have a Glock 45 I want to get my slide milled to get an optic cut so I can get a red dot, however I have zero knowledge about this entirely. I found a local guy that owns a business that will do an RMR cut for $90 bucks, and my LGS and friends recommend him and said he does a great job so I'm going to go with it. I told him I have no idea what RMR means and don't know much about optics, so he said for an RMR cut I could get a Holosun 407c and it would mount directly to the RMR cut and I wouldn't need a plate. Is this true? I've seen pictures of guns with plates and I don't like them so I do want to go with a cut that I can mount an optic directly to the cut he mills. Any advice would be appreciated.

Additional question: Does anyone know if the 19 round mags for the 19x will fit in the Glock 45?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbar9607
#4 ·
"RMR" is Trijicon's nomenclature for its "Ruggedized Miniature Reflex" sight. See - Trijicon RMR® Ruggedized Miniature Reflex Sight | Trijicon®

Holosun wisely designed its sights to fit the RMR footprint.

You only need a plate if you have a Glock MOS model. Glock designed its MOS setup as a general purpose slide cut method to accommodate a wide variety of different reflex sights by using adapter plates. The appropriate adapter plate is fastened to the slide and then the reflex sight is fastened to the adapter plate. IMO the use of an adapter plate adds an additional failure point, as opposed to mounting a reflex sight directly to the slide.

I have my slides milled and re-finished (nitrided) by Jagerwerks.com and I've been very pleased with their work.

Good luck!
 
#7 ·
I’m fairly new to o red dots myself. My first experience was with a Ruger MKII with a rear sight adapter plate with the dot mounted on that. I had a hard time finding the dot for fast follow ups. Did a lot of hunting and was pretty slow with it. It was extremely accurate, and it really stretched the distances I could hold a very small group. As I got older, my eyes couldn’t focus on the sights and target at the same time like I used to. I was sold on red dots, but thought it would take a lot of work to get better.

I had my Sig P229 milled for a RMR 06. When I started using it I realized the height of the Dot made a huge difference. The deep cut on the slide with no adapter plate lowered the Dot to almost the same height as the regular iron sights. When I draw the Sig and raise it to eye level the dot just rises into my focus on the target. I don’t have to hunt at all, it’s just there. The dot is now easier for me then irons. It’s on the same focal plain as the target.

Im going to have my G27 and G29 milled for RMRs soon.
 
#10 ·
+1 for jagerwerks

rmr is becoming a legacy footprint. You can use the Trijicon or the holosun, but the future is closed emitter like Steiner mps, acro, or new batch of holosuns.

not saying you need latest and greatest, but technology trends should be a consideration when making permanent changes.