Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

H&K CC9 range report

10K views 80 replies 29 participants last post by  Maccabeus  
#1 · (Edited)
I got lucky last week and was able to order a new HK CC9 from Sportsman’s Warehouse before they went out of stock (which took all of an hour).

No doubt most of you have seen some sort of online review when they were released, so I’ll spare you the technical details. Upon inspection, I found HK used a light, clear grease on all the areas you might expect to be lubricated (rails, locking block, barrel hood/underside of slide upper surface). I did apply a little oil to the barrel and recoil spring assembly as those were not greased. I didn’t add any oil to anyplace not indicated in the user manual.

At the range:
It came with one 10-round, and one 12-round magazine. At first, I could only get 11 rounds in the 12-round mag, but after a few refills and a bit of effort, I could fill it up completely. No issues with the 10-rounders. When empty, both mags drop free and with authority.

The trigger is quite nice, with a little take up and no noticeable creep. Easily better than stock Glock triggers and even the GPT.

I put 300 rounds of Federated Ordnance 124gr FMJ (NATO spec according to Federated) and it definitely feels warmer than your normal range fodder. I finished off with 26 rounds of 147gr HST and 18 rounds of 124gr HST+P just to make sure it cycled everything and it did. I did have two misfires with the FMJ. Primer indentations were normal depth (no light strikes) and both rounds fired when retried. I’m going to chalk that up as an ammo problem and not a pistol problem for now; I’ll make sure to take different ammo next trip. Fingers crossed it's just ammo.

Recoil is snappy as you would expect from a thin, lightweight “micro nine”. Definitely snappier than my G26, but that’s just physics. When using the 12-round mag and a firm grip, recoil control is no problem at all. That said, the grip texture is a little lacking. It’s a mild sandpaper-type feel in most places, but there’s a fair amount of real estate that’s completely smooth. I like a more aggressive grip texture and will likely add some kind of grip tape in the near future.

I plan to add an optic, but the iron sights (night sight front, blacked-out rear) are crisp and easy to use. So far, I’m digging it and looking forward to putting a lot more downrange.

Here’s a not-particularly-impressive pic showing the results of 147gr HST at 10 yards, shooting at a medium pace. Red area is 3”x4”.
Image
 
#4 ·
@LivingUpNorth do you expect this gun to be carried? And if yes, what would it replace for you?

What makes the difference for you in deciding to carry this one? It looks to be about the same size as a G43X, but you could say more having taken ownership of one.

I have heard very good things about the amount of effort HK put into testing this gun. That's impressive for me, though admittedly, I rarely have any issues with most of the big-name striker-fired carry guns.
 
#6 ·
@LivingUpNorth do you expect this gun to be carried? And if yes, what would it replace for you?

What makes the difference for you in deciding to carry this one? It looks to be about the same size as a G43X, but you could say more having taken ownership of one.

I have heard very good things about the amount of effort HK put into testing this gun. That's impressive for me, though admittedly, I rarely have any issues with most of the big-name striker-fired carry guns.
I do plan on eventually carrying it, with it supplanting my G26.5. It has the same capacity and just barely longer grip length as the G26 while being noticeably slimmer. That doesn't mean I don't like my 26 or that I think it's a bad gun - not remotely - I just wanted to try something that's not as thick. It's also shorter in overall length and height (grip length) than a 43X even with the 12-round extended baseplate mag, a least according to the Handgun hero website; I haven't compared them in person.

Aside from HK’s claimed reliability, the thing that spurred my interest was their claim of a longer length-of-pull compared to most micro nines. Having shot P365s and Hellcats, I could never get on with how small those grips felt to me and it’s why I kept coming back to the G26. The same with my Beretta APX A1 Carry. For as much as I liked that little pistol, I had to cant my wrist unnaturally to shoot it like my bigger guns. I realize that's generally the tradeoff with tiny guns, but it's not one I'm willing to deal with, long-term. With the CC9 I don't feel like I needed to adjust my grip like those little guns; it's pretty darn close to the G26 at least to me.
 
#8 ·
Yes, it is.


 
#9 ·
Direct mount for RMSc/Holosun k (it has front recoil bosses only to allow for Holosun k). Optic screws are M4x0.7; length is optic-dependent of course. HK recommends "medium strength, non-permanent thread locker", so I read that as the blue stuff. The cover plate is metal with a noticeable weight, so if anyone is concerned about possible function/cycling changes due to added weight of an optic, I don't think that's a concern at all with this one. I forgot to weigh the cover plate when it was off, but I'm confident there won't be a net gain in weight once you remove the cover and replace it with an optic.

Image
 
#11 ·
Part of me really wants one of these to replace my P365 because I have more intrinsic trust of HK than I do SIG.

The problem is I really, really like the smaller size of the P365.

Image


The CC9 is a direct parallel in size to the Shield Plus. (It's even taller if using the 12 round mag). A size I don't prefer for carry or I'd already have a Shield Plus.
Image


And, while I imagine the CC9 is more reliable, I have to admit my P365s and the countless others that have been sold haven't shown any issues beyond the initial release bumps (a few bad strikers, dead night sights, etc). I haven't heard any complaints like that in years about the P365s.
 
#22 ·
@LivingUpNorth Tenicor holsters are great, many say they are the best Kydex holster on the market. Strong clips, stable for reholstering, excellent shipping times, etc.

This is a big deal as they are easily the best Kydex maker to offer a CC9 holster so far plus Tenicor is well-known for rarely offering new holster molds. They do not make one for the VP9 for example.

I use one for my G19 and it is great.
 
#26 ·
I have the P365 and don't trust it. I've narrowed it down to replacing it with the HK CCP, IWI Masada slim (is this still available?) or SA XDS .45acp.
I really would like try the Masada slim but finding one is impossible. Finding the CCP is also dang near impossible too..
 
#27 ·
Those are all a bit different.

The CC9 is Shield sized, which is noticably bigger than the SIG.

The Masada Slim is even taller than the Shield/CC9 size.

The XDS is closer to the SIG in size but a different caliber and a much reduced capacity compared to the P365.


Image


Do you have any evidence or experience that makes you doubt the reliability of the P365? Or are you letting the bad press around the P320 color your view of the P365? There are countless numbers of them in circulation now with no patterns of complaints. Quite the contrary.

Some days I'm tempted to doubt the P365 that I carry but there's really no reason for me to do so. I've had years of excellent performance out of them.
 
#28 ·
As a known HK fanboy I’m simply not interested in such a small pistol.
I am looking heavily into the VP9 A1K. But with a couple VP9’s and VP9sk. I certainly don’t “need” it.
Prefer their hammer offerings anyway.
Each to their own regardless. I’m still glad HK made this pistol, just
My cup of tea. And it’s not offered with a paddle mag release so it’s another “no go” for me personally.
American style push button is just weird to me at this point. I like paddling 🤣😁!
 
#35 ·
For impressions are really good. I’m impressed at how slim they managed to make it while still holding the gun securely. That, combined with how slim the CC9 is, makes it extremely comfortable. DCC clips are my favorite attachment method, by far.

That said, I haven’t worn it beyond initial test fitting because I haven’t actually shot the pistol recently due to busy life issues combined with focusing on my Glocks in preparation for GSSF. In other words, I want more range time with the CC9 before I actually carry it.

Based on the overall build quality, there’s a good chance I’ll pick up their OWB holster for my 19.5 w/TLR-7.
 
#36 ·
Well, I crossed the 1000-round mark tonight on the CC9. Yep, it's a keeper. It reliably cycles all common weights and shapes of 9mm ammo and is pretty accurate. Well, for as accurate as I can be, of course. As far as micro-nines go, this feels the best in my hand. I've decided to only carry the 12-round mags with pinky extension since, on this gun anyway, the 12-rounders don't add any appreciable length to the grip over the flush, 10-rounders. And with the bigger mags, you get a full grip which I appreciate on a somewhat snappy pistol. They offer 10-round mags with the pinky extension which is what I would use if I lived in a ban state.

Side adventure: I wanted an enclosed optic and finally landed on a Holosun EPS. This is after aborted attempts with a Sig Romeo X enclosed and one of the new Shield AMSc enclosed units. The Sig Romeo X Enclosed was missing all the accessories in the original package. After 2 calls to Sig and 2 deliveries (one shredded/empty package thanks to FedEx), they still didn't send me any mounting screws. When I finally powered on the unit just to see how it looked, I found the reticle was more of an oval than a circle. Plus the glass was super distorted and had a weird tint around the outside edge.

The Shield AMSc seemed well-built and had a neat feature that allowed you to use different battery sizes (2025, 2032, or 2050), but it didn't have the option of manual brightness adjustment, only auto-brightness (I somehow missed that when I bought it). I have yet to find an optic where auto brightness works perfectly all the time, so that was a no-go for me. The dot refresh rate was very slow (like the early Vortex Defender CCW), so the dot appeared to flicker and disappear when transitioning from one target to another. Finally, the dot was the most blown-out starburst I've ever seen. Even taking into account my astigmatism, I haven't seen dots that misshapen on any other optic.

Both the Sig and Shield sights came from Optics Planet and both were fairly pricey for small optics. Both were in stock and arrived quickly, and when it came time to return them, OP made it easy. I know some people have had negative experiences with Optics Planet, but I generally like doing business with them.
 
#37 ·
That Tenicor holster looks interesting but its pretty expensive for a piece of plastic. I definitely need some holster recommendations as I currently have a CYA and am not impressed with it. The gun just doesn't seem to ride comfortably on my hip with it.

I have less then 500 rounds through the CC9 but I actually still seem to prefer the feel of the G43X. The CC9 definitely has less recoil though but the 43X is very manageable. I think I just need some more range time with the CC9 to get more used to it.
 
#40 ·
I have approx 350 rounds through the CC9 and I will admit that I like it a lot. It is the perfect size, where I can get a full grip using the 10 round mag and an even better purchase with the 12 rounder.

Trigger is nice. Fit and finish is great. This gun is a solid sturdy hunk of plastic. My biggest complaints to date are;

  • The firing pin will not activate my I Target bullet so dry firing is no longer as much fun. However, I have not had any issues at the range
  • The recoil spring is very stiff. Racking is 3x harder than in my Glock
  • This gun feels much heavier that its stated weight. My Glock feels much lighter to me

I still prefer the overall feel of the 43X in my hand, but I can easily live with the CC9. I used to think the 43x/48 were the perfect size height wise for a EDC, but the CC9 is perfect and to be able to get 12 rounds in the same size as the 43x 10 rounds is very impressive.

With that being said, and I know I am in the minority here but one of the things I love about carrying the Glock is the ability to thumb that baseplate using the SCD. This give me an added sense of security, which you can only get with a hammer fired gun.

For now I still go back and forth carrying both the 43x and the CC9 to determine which one I like better. I would like to get my hands on a CSX E series to see how that feels. I would prefer a DA/SA over SA, but would take SA over striker, with the exception of the Glock and SCD.