I love these guns. Bought the Smith after watching YouTube reviews. Wasn't looking for anything and saw the Canik at a local gun store. Now can't decide which to sell off.
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
I agreeIf you plan on keeping the gun and shooting it for many years, then I’d choose the S&W as the long-term support will likely be better from S&W.
I prefer steel over aluminum frames, so I can see why you’d throw the Walther in the mix, not to mention Walther did a great job with the Q5 SF. Having said that, there’s a lot to like about that S&W. My friend picked one up earlier this year and I wasn’t familiar with the gun at the time. After handling it, I was pleasantly surprised by it and can see why people like those as well.I agree
Turkish gun would go. In fact, a Walther Q5 SF would face been the way to go over both of those.
The Smith is a decent pistolI prefer steel over aluminum frames, so I can see why you’d throw the Walther in the mix, not to mention Walther did a great job with the Q5 SF. Having said that, there’s a lot to like about that S&W. My friend picked one up earlier this year and I wasn’t familiar with the gun at the time. After handling it, I was pleasantly surprised by it and can see why people like those as well.
As a Q4 SF, CZ Shadow 2, and Beretta 92x Performance owner, my vote is to sell both, and buy a Q5 SF. It's better quality and competition striker than both those options. Plus steel competition/range pistols > than polymer and aluminum IMHO. They also typically hold resale and collectors value better.I prefer steel over aluminum frames, so I can see why you’d throw the Walther in the mix, not to mention Walther did a great job with the Q5 SF. Having said that, there’s a lot to like about that S&W. My friend picked one up earlier this year and I wasn’t familiar with the gun at the time. After handling it, I was pleasantly surprised by it and can see why people like those as well.
It’s bit of a stretch to call the M&P a Glock cloneThe Canik is a Walther P99 clone.
The S&W is a Glock clone.
It’s the Clone Wars!
Tough call though I agree with previous comments about long term customer service being better with the S&W.
The M&P was a development from the Sigma pistols.It’s bit of a stretch to call the M&P a Glock clone
Major stretchThe M&P was a development from the Sigma pistols.
The Sigma was so much like the Glock that they sued S&W and won, forcing S&W to pay Glock a percentage for every unit sold.
So it’s not really a stretch to call it a clone or derivative.
Just my opinion.
You have your opinion and I have mine.Major stretch
The M&P is quite a bit different than the Sigma and not really any more like a Glock than several other polymers.
Sharing DNA, yes. Just like a Glock uses a Browning style locking system, like a 1911 and a locking block like a Sig.You have your opinion and I have mine.
Really every striker fired pistol made since the mid 80’s shares some DNA with Glock.
Again, my opinion.
YMMV
Hi Brian,I had the Smith for a short time. Decent pistol, but I wasn’t shooting it.
I don’t buy Turkish guns, but I imagine that shoots well
Aaaaaaaaaand this is why I am not really interested in staying on this forum after only about one week.Sharing DNA, yes. Just like a Glock uses a Browning style locking system, like a 1911 and a locking block like an Sig.
You called it a clone. I guess the CZ P10, Beretta APX, Ruger SR9, etc, etc are clones too. Heck, let’s call the new SA Echelon a clone too while we’re at it.
Wow okAaaaaaaaaand this is why I am not really interested in staying on this forum after only about one week.
I offer my opinion on ANY post and there’s always at least one person who wants to argue with what I said to show how much better their opinions are than mine.
Peace out.