Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

101 - 120 of 147 Posts
Nope, I'll take a 26 size any day.

The micro high(er) caps are all too thin for my hands, too big for my pockets and don't conceal any better on my belt than a proper sized subcompact.
 
This picture is terribly misleading, and it seems you fell for it yourself. Glock 26 is 1.26" at the widest point of the grip. The Sig is 1.06". This picture shows a difference of > 1/4" between the two grips. The G26 slide is 1" and the P365 is .87". The picture shows the Glock slide sticking out 1/4" further.

I can't quite put my finger on it, but I think it has something to do with the left slide stop being used as a reference point for alignment. All I know is it's bogus because the Glock is NOT 33% wider like the picture basically leads you to believe. Whoever doctored up this photo clearly wanted to bias the results. To make it accurate, the alignment reference point should have been the left side of the widest point of both grips, the left side of the slides, or dead center in the middle of both grips/slides. That would have dramatically changed the outcome of this visual comparison.

Where did this come from?
MLW85547 is correct. It is from Handgun hero.

I stopped using factory measurements long ago because some measured widest point (often controls), some took widest point minus controls (a spot on the grip or slide), some used slide width, and it was a mess.

If the graphic was distorted, it certainly wasn't my intent. But you are absolutely correct. The slide width is 1" on a G26/19/17/34, and I didn't catch that in the graphic. Thanks for noting it, and you are right!

Historically, HandgunHero has matched my overlays very nicely (I used to put guns I had on a X/Y ruler grid, then use the grid to align, then use transparencies, but handgun hero is WAY easier, and they have guns I don't own).

Sig P365 vs Glock 26 pic comparison

From Sigtalk, and courtesy of Cyanide171, see actual photos:
950096


950098


950099



Here is a G27 and G43 compared to a 365:
950133




If the scaling is wrong on HandgunHero, I do apologize. Deception is not my intent, and HandgunHero has proven to be really accurate for other comparisons I have done. Perhaps I should put a G26 on my ruler grid and do my Photoshop comparison overlay. Sadly, I don't have a G26 any longer (I sold mine prior to doing overlays like the one belo, and had to borrow a friend's G43 since I don't own one!).

Regardless, I have held both, and I have a G17 (which shares the slide width of a G26), and the difference is still substantial (if not exactly as pictured by HandgunHero).

I never rely on reported OAW. I either put calipers to mine, or use accurately aligned, overlayed, gridded photographs. I had started using HandgunHero, and the early ones were all perfect. This time, I was too trusting, and will have to pay a lot more attention prior to blindly trusting they aligned it correctly.

The below photo has the identical rulers on the four sides cropped out. This is what I historically did, but was liking the fact HandgunHero saved me tons of photography and photo-editing time!

950134
 
Yeah, the G26 slide is literally like 0.998" on my calipers Handgunhero is a great sight for some things, but that photo isn't quite right. Average thickness for a G26 is around 1.15", if not a bit less depending on measurement points...
Back to topic. G26 going away? Nah. Go with what works for you, what you like and trust.
Yep. Good points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PilatusTurbo
Not only is the G26 not obsolete, it’s in a class all by itself !!!
That's exactly what I said. It's the only sub compact that actually shoots more like its larger siblings-a class of its own. Typically, the opposite is true of subs. They generally shoot like other subs, which isn't 'snappy' like .357 or .44 mag, but jumpy.

When I'm shooting the 26, my mind sees the rear of the slide and it's the same exact thing as my G19, and it feels the same when shooting. My Glock 48 and 43 felt pretty much the same, and my P365 and P365XL felt exactly the same when shooting.
 
That's not really true. There are any number of short chunky double stack 9mms out there.
I think what bigsteve meant by his comment is that no other "chunky" double stack 9mm is really on par in terms of the smaller dimensions of the g26. The Springfield XD sub-compact, M&P, and all the others who entered the market afterwards are still chunkier, taller, have bulkier slides, etc. The g26 is really the only one I'm aware of that bridges the gap between all the other sub-compact double stack 9mm and the newer micro 9mm pistols. This size is truly "just right" for the optimal balance of being concealable and still easy to shoot like a larger pistol.
 
The GLOCK 26 will be obsolete when GLOCK designs another sub-compact that equals or exceeds the reliability/durability of the G26, while accepting G17 and G19 mags, and the 33-round G18 giggle stick.

In other words, NEVER. Let’s see the Armorer program and tools offered by those other manufacturers in support of their products. When they can beat 34 drop-in parts, a single punch, and a one-day course, I will be intrigued. Oh, and a proven track record that goes back to 1996, and is now
in it’s 5th Generation.

The new micro-nines will come and go. Glock 26 and Glock 43 will remain the standards they can’t meet, let alone exceed.


Sent from my iPhone using Glock Talk
 
The GLOCK 26 will be obsolete when GLOCK designs another sub-compact that equals or exceeds the reliability/durability of the G26, while accepting G17 and G19 mags, and the 33-round G18 giggle stick.

In other words, NEVER. Let’s see the Armorer program and tools offered by those other manufacturers in support of their products. When they can beat 34 drop-in parts, a single punch, and a one-day course, I will be intrigued. Oh, and a proven track record that goes back to 1996, and is now
in it’s 5th Generation.

The new micro-nines will come and go. Glock 26 and Glock 43 will remain the standards they can’t meet, let alone exceed.


Sent from my iPhone using Glock Talk
Well said. :)
 
It ain’t gowing nooowhere.

I’m tempted to by a Hellcat because I was always fond of SA. Then I think, I won’t carry it in my pocket cause I don’t roll like that. I prefer my ccw in a holster iwb or aiwb. Honestly my G26 is already a little too small for anything in a belt holster other than aiwb. I guess a Hellcat would be a little more comfortable than the 26 aiwb, but not really worth it to me right now. Maybe I’ll get a micro compact for my wife.
 
I bought someone's unloved 26 Gen 5 the other day. I got it for a great price w/ Ameriglo sights and it shoots as well as my 19M.

I have a gen 5 G26 with Truglo H3's and it is the perfect carry for me.
 
Let’s see the Armorer program and tools offered by those other manufacturers in support of their products. When they can beat 34 drop-in parts, a single punch, and a one-day course, I will be intrigued. Oh, and a proven track record that goes back to 1996
You know, those are easily forgotten/overlooked but very effective points!
 
That's one of the biggest things about the Glock 26,and what future proofs it, is the magazine compatibility with service size guns. It's also one of the biggest detriments to the G43, G43X and G48. They're all different magazines, except obviously the 43X and 48 mags. Then, smaller guns like the P365 and other micro 9s are all proprietary mags, same situation.

I just shot all my handguns with exception of the .22 stuff yesterday. Didn't run the 26 much, as I was testing and focusing on practicing with other guns. I did shoot the G26 literally right after my G43 and GX4, and it was a noticeably nicer gun to shoot. I obviously like the smaller guns, too, I own a few of them. They're all great options, and it just depends on what each user wants.
 
101 - 120 of 147 Posts