Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

1 - 20 of 28 Posts
This is why...

Image


:animlol:




Seriously, if you're going for long range slug hits, go for it! Who knows, could be the next big thing?
 
If it's a dedicated corn field slug gun, why not. I've got a Marlin Slugmaster that has a swivel stud in the fore end to take a Harris. If I'm ever stand hunting with it where I may have long shots, I may put a bipod on.

Brush hunting, or on any sort of 'tactical' shotgun...nope, can't see a reason to.

I did used to have an adapter on my 870 that I made that allowed a clamp on bi pod to be fitted, and I used one in turkey shoots.
 
Only rifle I put a bipod on are varmint rifles where I will be laying in a field waiting for Mr. Groundhogs to stick his head up.

Anything else I just use a sling. Used properly a sling is just as stable as a bipod. Just not as comfortable.

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
 
You don't need a bipod on a gun to shoot anything inside of 120 yards--which is about the max effective range of a shotgun with slugs. If you can't get into a steady position to hit a target at 120 yards you need to work on your position shooting form which can be easily and cheaply accomplished with a .22 rimfire. Standing, sitting, kneeling, prone.... you need to practice these positions on paper for score.

You really shouldn't need a bipod on anything for shots that close. It adds a pound and a half to the front of the gun, gets hung up on everything, and ruins the balance of a gun meant for close combat and fast handling.

THAT's why you don't put a bipod on a shotgun. Its not a shooting aid in this application. Its a crutch for someone who can't shoot.
 
I suppose it would make sense if you were using this

Image


To use these rounds

Image


And you were going to be shooting prone I could see it making sense. It would seem to be a very specific set of circumstances. Kind of like how you find plenty of bipods on bolt action rifles but very few on AR-15s meant for closer range stuff.
 
No need to be an ass. I'm now able to hit a gong at 70 yards consistently and trying to find my max range. Simply trying to think outside the box.
I would think myself into a rifle box:tongueout:
 
No need to be an ass. I'm now able to hit a gong at 70 yards consistently and trying to find my max range. Simply trying to think outside the box.
Work on your shooting ability, not the equipment. We don't put bipods on shotguns for the same reason we don't put them on pistols - they are close-range weapons. If your target is too far away for a shotgun without a bipod, you need a rifle. Trying to extend the range of a smooth-bore gun, instead of just using a rifle is a waste of time.
 
My shooting ability is fine, in hindsight the bipod was a poor idea.
Its no worse an idea than the Lever action rifle I saw in the gun store this morning. Flash hider, sliding stock, tactical rails, laser, scope, and vertical pistol grip. I wouldnt be caught dead at the range with that cluster**** of a rifle
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts