I want to get a Glock 32 barrel for my Glock 23 and would like your advice on whether I should get a legit Glock barrel or if a Lone Wolf after-market barrel is fine at $50 less?
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
^^THIS^^If you're going to carry I think I'd stick with the Glock barrel but otherwise the LW is fine.
That's as good a reason as any! And that will be the same reason I end up picking up a 10mm some day soon.It's cool, give it go, you can always sell the barrel easily if it doesn't float your boat.
As it's been written before in other threads the 357 sig round mimics the 357 magnum for the most part. It's exceeds 40s&w ballistics both muzzle energy and velocity with less snappy recoil. I don't see why a person wouldn't carry 357sig unless they just can't accord it. Pound for pound it's a great caliber.Thanks for the answers. After doing research on the .357 SIG, though, I really wonder what it is that really attracts so many? In the world of "man stopper" the only thing that the .357 SIG seems to offer is higher velocity and penetration. But isn't "over-penetrating" something everyone seems to warn against? What is it about this round that people like? I get the passion for the .45 ACP and even the scarey 10mm Automatic, but where does the .357 SIG actually fit (in your heart?). Why do I need to splurge for a barrel where the loads can be a dollar-per-round? Enlighten me. What did the US Secret Service see in the Glock 31, 32, and 33?
I am sold!I don't see why a person wouldn't carry 357sig unless they just can't accord it. Pound for pound it's a great caliber.
$25 bucks less for me...I want to get a Glock 32 barrel for my Glock 23 and would like your advice on whether I should get a legit Glock barrel or if a Lone Wolf after-market barrel is fine at $50 less?