Just wondering... What is the difference between the holographic and red dot sights?
I just got a Trijicon Reflex RX06-14 but I also have an EOTech 517 which is a HWS. If a Reflex is just a dressed up red dot... why does Trijicon charge more than the EOTech HWS?
1) The typical RDS (like Aimpoint) bounces light from an LED off the forward lens back to your eye. Due to curvature of the lens you experience parallax where if your eye isn't perfectly centered behind the optic then POI will not coincide w/POA. Aimpoint uses an additional lens to minimize parallax but Aimpoint does have minor parallax out to 50yds.
2) A HWS like the Eotech uses a laser (which uses far more power than Aimpoint's LED and accounts for Eotech's relatively poor battery life) to produce a hologram of the reticle (the hologram itself is contained within the HUD but the laser is needed to make it visible). Because of this there is no parallax w/a hologram. However, due to the nature of holograms the reticle is composed of many small pixellated dots instead of a single continuous image which are visible if you increase the intensity too much or focus on the reticle instead of the target.
3) At less than 50yds I doubt there's enough parallax w/an Aimpoint for you to notice under real-life conditions and beyond 50yds there's no parallax to worry about (but this isn't true when using cheaper RDS's).
4) Trijicon optics are over-engineered to withstand an incredible amount of abuse. While I have heard of (and experienced) complaints about the Reflex series dealing w/reticle washout under certain lighting conditions I have *never* heard of a Reflex failing outright. Perhaps this coupled w/whatever engineering & legal requirements needed to include what is essentially a nuclear power source contribute to the cost.
Just MHO...
Tomac