First things first is I want to say that the 9mm is a great all around caliber. It strikes a great balance between capacity and power.
That being said, the arguments for it being superior to the .357 SIG, .40, and .45 are ridiculous. I just want 9mm fans to be honest here.
The 9mm is ballistically inferior to the aforementioned calibers above. There’s no debating it, but yet I see 9mm fans say that “the 9mm has caught up”, but those advancements wouldn’t just magically apply to ONLY 9mm. It’s a weird argument.
For the 9mm people who argue that all pistol calibers are the same and there’s no real difference… why don’t you carry a .30 Super Carry? Or a .380? Or a .22? Well the simple answer is they aren’t confident in the stopping power of those rounds.
I just want the 9mm folks to stop with the delusion and pretending the 9mm is on par with the bigger dogs. It’s a great caliber and I’ve owned several 9mms and have carried them extensively. I just think it’s time to stop treating the 9mm as if it’s this golden child. It’s not and that’s OK.
That being said, the arguments for it being superior to the .357 SIG, .40, and .45 are ridiculous. I just want 9mm fans to be honest here.
The 9mm is ballistically inferior to the aforementioned calibers above. There’s no debating it, but yet I see 9mm fans say that “the 9mm has caught up”, but those advancements wouldn’t just magically apply to ONLY 9mm. It’s a weird argument.
For the 9mm people who argue that all pistol calibers are the same and there’s no real difference… why don’t you carry a .30 Super Carry? Or a .380? Or a .22? Well the simple answer is they aren’t confident in the stopping power of those rounds.
I just want the 9mm folks to stop with the delusion and pretending the 9mm is on par with the bigger dogs. It’s a great caliber and I’ve owned several 9mms and have carried them extensively. I just think it’s time to stop treating the 9mm as if it’s this golden child. It’s not and that’s OK.