The latest SIG Spears (XM7) being delivered to the 101st this September seem to have deleted the forward assist.
The forward assist on the XM7 has been present on all prototypes and testing rifles:
Anyone have any insight on this ? I have a few theories:
1. SIG convinced the Army the XM7 FA is unnecessary, especially on a piston system. (Although JSOC/SOCOMs new Spear-LT all have FAs.)
2. Shave a few ounces off the total weight and/or less protrusions to catch on.
3. Cost savings (SIG), and/or logistics (Army won't have to keep spare parts on hand, Armorers won't have to receiving armorer training on this part and develop a replacement schedule).
The forward assist on the XM7 has been present on all prototypes and testing rifles:
Anyone have any insight on this ? I have a few theories:
1. SIG convinced the Army the XM7 FA is unnecessary, especially on a piston system. (Although JSOC/SOCOMs new Spear-LT all have FAs.)
2. Shave a few ounces off the total weight and/or less protrusions to catch on.
3. Cost savings (SIG), and/or logistics (Army won't have to keep spare parts on hand, Armorers won't have to receiving armorer training on this part and develop a replacement schedule).