Sig Sauer should've follow the example of Glock with their three safety features. Then they would not have all these lawsuits from accidental discharges.
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
This doesn't make sense. If you meant it hasn't been out long enough to see if there's issues, that doesn't make sense. It's been out PLENTY long to where if t here were issues and mechanical failures they would have been noticed. The thing about millions of Americans firing the same gun at the range make issues with the gun appear pretty quick; so far, so good. They hit gold with that gun.I don't hate anything or anyone when it comes to tools and toys that go bang. I happen to like Sig Sauer. In fact I own one myself.
I am not talking about a popularity contest when it comes to choosing the P365 and whether it is as you say the most popular CCW pistol on the market. Only time will tell if the P365 lives up to its purported reputation at this juncture in time when it comes to striker fire handguns. It just has not been out there that long in the grand scheme of things. The world is full of tastes and tasters.
The guy you quoted is a FUDD, I can't stand people who cry that a gun has malfunctions after hundreds of thousands of rounds. Well no ****... The average person won't put even a fraction of that through the gun. This is like complaining you have to repair a car after driving it 200,000 miles. You are complaining to just complain.Well, we already have several examples of P365's going to at or near 100k rounds. Is that not sufficient?
Considering that if you consistently put 100 rounds on the pistol each and every month for the next 17 years you'd only reach 20k. And considering that in certain segments of the market, such as Micro-9's, Sig is far superior in just about every metric. Not to mention pistols in 40S&W.