Looks really nice. I had the first generation and it was a great little pistol. Traded it for something else but have thought about grabbing a new .380

my little LCP does the job but this appears to be a pretty big step up in capacity alone

 

I am glad it was a full redesign, while keeping it small.

 

Interesting. The company does a lot of market analysis, and they obviously decided the striker-fired design was more popular than the DAO design.

I only passed on the original BG380 because it was slightly larger and heavier than the LCP I was comparing it against. Also, I didn't want a laser, but the laser being a standard item changed soon enough.

It appears the new 2.0 iteration of the original Bodyguard (long since moved over into the M&P line) may be a bit larger, still. Same approx length, height and barrel length, though. Probably a fine choice for women and those shooters who require a taller grip frame profile (and the added serrations added for ease of grasping and slide retraction likely speak to the same group).

Then, there's the whole 'capacity' contingent who will probably like this new model.

I wonder if they'll continue production of the original series, or whether the 2.0 will simply replace it? It might make sense for them to keep a model that's a reasonable competitor to the Ruger LCP in original format. Dunno. At the moment their online catalog just adds the new model, and still lists the original and the EZ 380.

 

It's tempting, needs some seasoning, because S&W has been using early adopters as Quality Assurance team.
Geoff
Who notes it's close to the FN 1910 in size.

 

So Smith is copying the Glock 42 now..

 

NOT

 

At 9.8oz, that thing's gonna suck to shoot. I'd love to see something that size and capacity, but around 13-14oz.

 

Looks like a high capacity G42. I would think that 9.8 oz. weight might be off.

 

Be curious to see how big it really is. Need to see it next to original BG or next to an LCP.

 

Looks pretty good, like a mini Shield Plus.

Sootch on YouTube already has a review out:

Key takeaways:

• It looks slightly longer than an LCP Max.
• Sootch says it shoots pretty good. Does not look snappy
• 10+1 flush fit, 12+1 extended. Flush fit still fit Sootxh’s hand for a 3-finger grip.
• Serated black u-notch rear, orange tritium front.

Overall, I’m interested. I think it could replace my LCP Max as a more shootable, “fightable” gun. Kind of hits the bell for my 42X 10+1 I’ve been wanted from Glock for a while. Maybe now they’ll have to answer!

Will give it time to see how QC is and reliable it is. Sootch said he didn’t have any issues but that’s typical with sent-for-review models nowadays. It’s the mainstream production that’ll tell the truth of things

 

Thanks for posting. Think my LCP Max is for sale.

 

I'm glad he had an LCP max to compare size with.
Looks like its still pocketable which all I would use a .380 for myself.

 

So I went into my local shop today, and they had 2 of these in stock, $50 off of MSRP. So thin, so pocketable, nicely lightweight, usable sights (front night sight!), and has good capacity. Easily as pocketable as my LCP, fits in the same pocket holster. It's definitely larger with the 12 round mag inserted, but still pocketable in my cargo shorts.

One came home with me. Won't get to shoot it 'til Thursday, will report further then, but man this thing feels NICE.

 

I didn’t watch much of the vid but it looks to be about the size of the G42. Not a criticism just an observation.
I don’t know too much about the BG line as I’ve just gotten back into .380 with my gf’s 42.

 

It’s smaller than the 42 (which is surprising to me):

Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 vs Glock G42 size comparison | Handgun Hero

Compare the dimensions and specs of Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock G42

www.handgunhero.com

 

That thing looks monstrously huge (for a small pocket .380).

But, looking at S&W's specs, they are supposedly exactly the same except for weight:

Original on left, 2.0 on right

Are these numbers right?

I have my doubts based on Sootch showing a different weight than S&W lists (11.5 vs 9.8).

Or maybe Sootch was measuring loaded weight??

If this thing is the same size as the BG380 I already have, but with 10+ rounds, I'm very interested.

If this thing is larger like it looks, I'll pass. I've got plenty of larger guns. Something has to keep filling the role of tiny, pocket gun.

Can we get one in 30 Super Carry? 🤔

 

Apparently it’s nearly the size of the original BG380. I’m confused on the specs too, seems something got mixed up.

Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 vs Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 380 size comparison | Handgun Hero

Compare the dimensions and specs of Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 380

www.handgunhero.com

 

Glad they got away from the fish scale slide serrations. The one thing about the M&P line I didn't get along with.

 

BRAND NEW - Bodyguard 2.0 - Smith & Wesson (youtube.com)

S&W Bodyguard 2.0! its small but has a great personality. (youtube.com)

Smith & Wesson BodyGuard 2.0 Review (youtube.com)


This guy compares it to several Micro9/slimline guns beginning at: 12:40
S&W Bodyguard 2.0! its small but has a great personality. - YouTube


One of the few who bothered to compare it to the original.
The NEW Smith and Wesson Bodyguard 2.0!! (youtube.com)
(But, for the record, doing a horrible job of comparing them).

This guy does a better job:

Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 Range Review at KYGUNCO - YouTube

(There's several other videos of people just shooting or talking about it, but I was looking for details and comparisons).


Thanks to @trucker-chase who found it on Handgun Hero already. That's helpful. (But I always like to see real life comparisons, too, since I'm always wondering if HH has some wiggle room on its accuracy).

 

That looks pretty good! I think I need another gun

 

View attachment 1311935

Apparently it’s nearly the size of the original BG380. I’m confused on the specs too, seems something got mixed up.

Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 vs Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 380 size comparison | Handgun Hero

Compare the dimensions and specs of Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 380

www.handgunhero.com

View attachment 1311934

It’s smaller than the 42 (which is surprising to me):

Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 vs Glock G42 size comparison | Handgun Hero

Compare the dimensions and specs of Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock G42

www.handgunhero.com

Glock could've made the G42 smaller. No doubt. However, we were told in an armorer class that when Glock started thinking about making a .380, they evaluated the last 3 years of commercial (not LE/Gov) ammunition sales, and observed that .380 was the fastest selling non-duty caliber, and that the significant percentage of buyers of .380's were female. We were told they wanted a smallish .380 that would give new female buyers/shooters a comfortable shooting experience in what became the G42. This was at the same time that you could hear/read how a lot of buyers of the really diminutive .380's, like the LCP, would complain about the felt recoil and the small grip.

Personally, while I didn't want to buy one (because of the size), I think Glock nailed the overall market with their G42.

S&W has their 380EZ for customers wanting a larger grip frame and an easier shooting .380, so it makes sense they'd keep the newest iteration of the Bodyguard as small as possible, for the customers who favored ultimate concealability over other 'comfort' issues.

 

I agree that Glock nailed it with the G42. My wife owns an earlier LCP and she was fine with it until her hand strength degraded to the point that she could no longer rack the slide. By comparison, her Glock 42 was easier to use and much softer to shoot. She was fine with it until her hand strength degraded to the point that she could no longer rack the slide. Size and recoil were never an issue for her. She still shoots her LCP, her G42 and her .45 1911s very well. I just have to rack the slides for her. Her .380EZ and at least for now, her 9mm EZ allow her to fully operate her personal carry. Until now, there have been no other handgun choices that could replace my beloved BG 380, but I'm anxious to handle the new BG 2.0.

 

i have an original BG380, and have been carrying it more often, including today, hot out. it carries easily in my pocket, with a pocket holster. i have the laser version, didn't want that but it was in stock and without was not..
i might want one if it is, or feels smaller, bigger is out of the question..

 

I've carried an original BG380 nearly since the beginning. I have zero complaints about it. It fits my particular need for me to a tee. I just found out about the BG 2.0 about an hour ago. I haven't seen any of the videos yet and may not be able to watch any for a while. Interestingly, here is how S&W calls it.

 

I like the looks of it, but I'd have to hold one first. These little micro guns don't work so well for me with their tiny sized grips. I have the first gun Bodyguard as well as a 9 and 40 caliber Shield, and they are just too small for me to get a good grip on.

 

I have one of the original 380 Bodyguards. Their was no option of a laser or no laser, they all came with lasers at the time. They would easily fit into a jeans pocket in a pocket holster. The trigger was the worst trigger of any gun that I have. I used to carry it in my pocket, but haven’t for quite a few years. The new one might be a lot better, but I’d have to see it. Hold it, and try that trigger.

 

I’m on the list at my local place when they get one in. I’m not obligated to buy it but I’m very intrigued by it. I didn’t like the LCP max much and gifted it to my father in law and went back to carrying my old Gen 1 LCP. I do really like the g42 and have a hard time thinking there is much of anything better as far as shootabilty than it. I won’t know till I put one in my hands. Is 380 ideal? No it is not but if it fits in cargo shorts pockets easily I’ll probably buy it

 

I'll keep my LCP Max. I'm hoping someone makes a teue pocket pistol in 9mm someday

 

Check out a Kahr PM9/CM9. It is a true pocket pistol (near the size of the BG .380 v1.0) in 9mm. Great firearm; reliable and accurate.

 

Here's some pics of mine, along with my 1st gen LCP. As you can see, the sizes are VERY similar, with the Bodyguard 2.0 being slightly longer in the grip. The width comparison photo is the best I could get - the mag baseplate on the Bodyguard 2.0 makes it look wider than it actually is - most of the gun is slimmer than the LCP, but it was hard to get a better shot. The scale pic at 9.85 ounces is with no mag, and matches the advertised weight. The other pic is with the empty 10 round mag. Obviously, the 12 round mag makes the grip a wee bit longer, but it still fits easily in my cargo shorts pocket with the extended mag.

More info to come after I've actually fired the gun...

 

Thanks for sharing.

 

So S&W is advertising a weight figure that includes no magazine.

Seems like a worthless data point. No one carries a pistol without a magazine (and ammo!).

I suppose it's just marketing manipulation to make it sound lighter than it really is.

 

I got on the list at my FFL. Looks like distribution will be allocated for awhile.