I use my LC9s Pro for pocket carry in cargo shorts in the summer / Florida with an Alabama pocket holster:
A few months ago I traded a Rock Island GI 1911 to my neighbor for his Glock 43. My goal was / is to replace my LC9s Pro for pocket carry. The problem is, I just don't shoot the Glock 43 as well as I shoot the LC9s Pro.
I normally carry my Glock 43X OWB summer and winter.
Last year I traded my Ruger LCP in on a LCP Max 380. It's a nice gun to throw in my pocket in the evening after carrying my 43X all day. However, it hasn't made it into my EDC carry rotation. I probably should've just kept the smaller LCP.
So going back to the original topic...
The trigger on the LC9s Pro is WAY better than the LCP Max 380. It doesn't have the wall in the pull that the LCP, LCPII, and LCP Max has.
Another reason I like the LC9s Pro is because it has dovetailed front and rear sights My LC9s Pro has tritium night sights. Ruger discontinued the LC9s Pro and replaced it with the cheapened EC9 that doesn't have dovetailed sights.
I can't speak to the Ruger Max 9 as I have no interest in it - already owning a Glock 43X. But if the Max 9 has the similar BAD trigger like the LCP Max, I would pass on it.