Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

1 - 20 of 99 Posts

Urg8rb8

· Registered
Joined
·
16 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I went to the range today intending to rent a Glock 30 because i'm considering it for purchase as a CCW. Unfortunately they didn't have the 30, but, they had a 36 instead so I rented it. After firing a few rounds of it, I noticed that the recoil was a bit punchy. I am wondering what the difference in recoil is between them. I'm guessing the 30 should have less recoil because it has more weight. But how much less? Should I even bother trying to rent a Glock 30 if i've already test fired the 36? My plan is, if I thought the Glock 30 was too punchy, then I was going to just get the Glock 19.

I'm new to the gun world but I am learning a lot! Your help would be greatly helpful and appreciated!
 
Image
to the forum.

I have a 30SF (SF = short frame) and had the 36 at the same time. There are those, like me, that had the 36 and no longer have it, because it didn't feel right in their hands and found it more snappy than they liked. I like my 30SF because it handles the recoil better and I like the SF frame. I also carry it in OWB leather holsters and a De Santis IWB hybrid without a problem.

There are those that really like them and carry them all the time.

I would try to shoot the 30 before you make your decision, thereby you can have a objective comparison between the two. Like I said, I had them both at the same time and shot them side-by-side which allowed me to make my decision based on observable results.

At the end it's going to be your decision based on what you like and why.

Good luck with your purchase.
 
The G36 IS "Punchy".

It is a very light weight and fairly thin .45 ACP (350-400 lb-feet of energy).

No free lunch in physics.

The G30 has a heavier slide, which tames flip, and increases cycle dwell, thereby reducing "punch".

But it's thicker, heavier, and fat-assed (thick in the grip).

If you slow your cadence down a little and allow the G36 to reset?

They are a very accurate pistol and not all that hard to shoot.

They are just a little different, along with being lighter, thinner, and sexier (small assed).




Nutter
 
The 36 is for ccw.

Most everyone who's written on a ccw event, don't mention recoil.

If you're so sensitive that you will be thinking about the recoil instead of putting your first round on target, then maybe 9mm is for you.

The recoil difference between the 30 and the 36 are not unnoticable, just insignificant.

Batts
 
The 30 gen4 is a great shooting pistol and wouldn't hesitate getting it over the 36.
 
What I noticed firing the 30 and 36 side by side was the slimmer frame of the 36 seemed to hurt more, the frame digging deeper into the hand.
The wider frame of the 30 distributes the recoil across a wider section of the hand, and lessens felt recoil.

Let's just say I kept my 30 and let the 36 go home with its owner.
 
Unloaded the 30s weighs just a 1/2 ounce more, but does have a larger grip for those needing such.

The regular 30 does absorb recoil, but I feel if the weapon fits the hand it assists in acceptability.

Suggest you try the 30s and see if fit is more comfortable, then realize the 30sf for its weight of carry and shooting comfort.

Good Luck in your quest.
 
I have both a 36 and 30sf. I have smaller hands so the 30 is not my cup of tea, the recoil isn't much different between the two to me, but my primary ccw is a .40 (G27) so recall isn't a determining factor on my choices. The 36 has proven for me to be more accurate in my hands and usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul53
I know you are talking about recoil - but as others have said the difference between the two isn't that much. If you would ever consider converting it to another caliber, the 30 is the way to go. If I just wanted a nice compact cc piece, I'd go with the 36. Ehhhh, get both. Life is too short. :O)
 
Have both 30s and 30sf. G20sf. G30s (same for 36) as a CCW couldn't be better. Sometimes I am forgetting I have it in iwb. 20 lb spring.

G30sf I am using while jogging trails and as a back up with 22lb and 45super.(no 45S for 30s).
Recoil with the same ammo in between those two isn't to different. But in case of quick aiming and follow up shots G30s with narrow slide and high Trijicon night sights with U notch and front bright red limb surely a winner.
 
What I noticed firing the 30 and 36 side by side was the slimmer frame of the 36 seemed to hurt more, the frame digging deeper into the hand.
The wider frame of the 30 distributes the recoil across a wider section of the hand, and lessens felt recoil.

Let's just say I kept my 30 and let the 36 go home with its owner.
Pro tip: fasten a maxi pad to the grip with duct tape to alleviate the pain
 
OP, not wanting to muddy the waters but if "thin" and concealable is important and big fat bullets, then I suggest renting a G30 and a S&W Shield .45.
My 30s and 19 have been in the safe since I found the Shield on Labor Day.
.02cents FWIW. Either way, I applauded you seeking information. Good luck and welcome to Glock Talk Forum.
 
The standard Glock .45 slides are thicker to add weight to reduce felt recoil.

As mentioned above, the G36 frame is thinner, so recoil is focused into the
hand across a smaller area. It is not unmanageable, but it does feel like it
recoils more.

The G36 will hide better and is lighter.
 
The G36 recoil felt "sharp and abrupt" to me.. I don't like the way it felt in may hands either. The front to back width is goofy and messed with me I wear a L sized glove if that means anything. I loved the Glock 30SF I used to have, but I'm all in on the Glock 30S.. Only if they'd do one in Gen 4!
 
1 - 20 of 99 Posts