Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

Generations: Glock Speed Loaders

5.9K views 18 replies 7 participants last post by  AZ Husker  
#1 ·
I own a Gen 2 Glock 17 made in May 1990 and purchased later that same year.

After 24 years of ownership, I considered selling her to pay for a Gen 3 or Gen 4 Glock 17.

I had replaced all of the internal parts except for the locking block, but I had saved every original part except for the recoil spring that failed.

After caressing the smooth lines of my first Glock, I decided not to sell her. The one part, though, that i could not identify as original was the speed loader.

I have seven speed loaders that size, one each for my Gen 2 G17, Gen 3 G26 G22 G23 and a Gen 4 G35. I also have two additional speed loaders I bought separately as spares, so a total of seven.

One of my speed loaders has a number 483 with a superscript 2 just below the Glock logo on the LEFT side.

I have two speed loaders with what appears to be a QR code below the Glock logo on the RIGHT side and one speed loader with a code on the LEFT side.

The other speed loaders are MIA, but Im sure I still have them.

The one with the 483.2 number has less texture than the others. Im not sure whether that is from wear or if it was designed that way. Im guessing that 483.2 as the oddball is my original Gen 2 G17 speed loader. However, my G26 was made in the mid 90s so that is pretty old too. All the others were bought post-2011.

If im correct that this is a scan code, then i think all of them are recent. But i could not get my QR reader to read it. I see discernible patterns under magnification, but nothing I can recognize.

Anybody have insights on Glock speed loaders by generation?

PS, my magazine baseplates are also likely not original since I added plus two baseplates years ago, but i still have the original magazines plus a third one I bought separately. Ive given up trying to locate the orinal baseplates out of the 30 I own, and I may have actually trashed them years ago.
 
#2 ·
Old baseplates depend on DF or NDF standard mags, no marking exceot GLOCK early NDF Mags. 455 stamped on the bottom latest gen NDF mags, 3206 marked on the bottom, gen 2/3 DF mags, current production mag baseplates are also unmarked but definatly different than the unmarked early ones, now about the loaders, 3 digit marked
4 8 3 early Glocks, 483-1 or 483-2 later produced Glocks.
Early (+) bases marked 1967, newer 7151.
 
#3 ·
Old baseplates depend on DF or NDF standard mags, no marking exceot GLOCK early NDF Mags. 455 stamped on the bottom latest gen NDF mags, 3206 marked on the bottom, gen 2/3 DF mags, current production mag baseplates are also unmarked but definatly different than the unmarked early ones, now about the loaders, 3 digit marked
4 8 3 early Glocks, 483-1 or 483-2 later produced Glocks.
Early (+) bases marked 1967, newer 7151.

I will look when I get home I still have my original 1987 speed loader from my gen 1 g17, which was smooth sided and not like the the gen 2 glock 19 or gen 1 glock 17 I purchased the next year. Those speed loaders were more like the ones we get today.
 
#4 ·
Wow, thanks guys.

My magazines are definitely NDF. I'm pretty certain I destroyed one of the baseplates the first time I changed them. I didn't have YouTube or instructions back then.

I do have a plus 2 base plate that is noticeably smaller than current versions, so I think that was the first one I bought.

So we've identified the 1990 speed loader. Now to explain why one speed loader had the logo on the left side and what that little symbol is beneath the logo.

I'm certain I found my original brush because I used it a lot. I need to double check the brush handle.
 
#7 ·
I found three baseplates with 3206 on them.

I found four inserts with 1693 on them while all the rest say 5166.

So I believe these go with my G17.

I have two baseplates which have no hole in the bottom and no numbers. I suspect these are the original G26 baseplates. Or perhaps they are the original G17. When did Glock add holes in the baseplate?

My smaller expanded base plate actually says +2 rather than just +. I think this was the original OEM part I bought in the 90s. It has no hole either.
 
#8 ·
POW,

Any Glock mag with a U notch is non drop free.

The baseplates with no hole for the locking plate are very early. The only earlier ones are the ones with no Glock trademark on them, they are flat and smooth.

The early +2s were marked just that way. The later ones are marked just plus. When the 9mm was the only caliber they made, the +2 was a true statement.

When other calibers came along it wasn't true any longer. At some point, I don't know when it was changed to just +.

The earliest mag loaders were smooth on the sides, no texturing at all. I got one with a two letter serial number prefix 23 just recently.


Cat
 
#10 ·
The mag loader is the square open ended piece of black plastic that comes with all new Glocks, hardly used they have changed in design over the years like everything else, POWCA, your bases match your mags, and you have an early (+) mag bottom. Newer (+) bottoms are part #7151 and come with an insert. Enjoy your Glocks.
 
#12 ·
Thanks Cadillac.

I successfully matched the baseplates without holes to the 1990 G17. In the process, I also identified the baseplates and inserts for my G26 magazines. Thanks for all your help.

I found a website that shows pictures of the first eight generations of Glock magazines, with Gen 4 being the 9th.

http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=5&f=13&t=84144

My magazines are generation 3 of 8. They have Austria under the Glock logo. They do, in fact, have a metal lining which is clearly seen through the round count window (as opposed to gen 1 of eight). These are probably not "fully" metal lined and I can tell you from experience they dont drop free.

I also identified my speed loader which, on the original box says "loading support."

So the only original piece i have not identified is the cleaning rod, and the only original part I dont have is the recoil spring I threw away as defective (and the spring loaded bearing that flew across the room last night :)
 
#13 ·
Guess I'm getting old and kind of slow but what on earth is the "speed loader" you keep referring to?

In the middle of this thread you started talking about magazines. Are they what you are calling speed loaders? Never heard that name used for magazines before. Odd!

Dave
Sorry for the confusion Dave. My original post concerned the magazine loading support, often called a speed loader - the thingy that you put on top of the magazine to push the rounds down to load the next one. The discussion changed to magazine baseplates and magazine inserts.

As soon as I figure out how to upload pictures here, I will share my relic with the crowd. It feels so nice in the hand, I can see why people prefer it over later gens. I put modern parts back in it for safety, convenience, and reliability, but im saving all the original parts.
 
#17 ·
My question isn't about using them or how good they work. It's about having all of the original equipment as a collector's item.

FWIW, I've used the Glock speed loaders for 25 years and have had very few problems. A new magazine is always difficult to load. Once the springs are compressed, they get easier.

My 1911, Sig and CZ didn't come with mag loader at all, and I''ve had lots of difficulty loading those especially since the angle of the mag when braced on a flat surface is pretty steep.

I own several Lulas. Some of them are good, some not so good.
 
#19 ·
I put every part I take off right back in the box, including 1911 grips I could sell. I have a collection of unfired and fired first year Kimbers and I even have the price tags and the advertisement to upgrade to wooden grips for each one. No confusion since everything is in the original marked box.