[JCROWNII]

Hello GT,

I am researching the differences between the BCM M4 Carbine Mod 2 and the BCM Mid 16 Mod 2. I currently own a carbine length rifle with a 16" barrel and know the weight of my rifle with all added accessories i.e. weapon light, optics, etc.

My first concern is, I am aware the Mid 16 would be heavier than the M4 but by how much? Being that the rail is extended 2", I am concerned it might gain too much weight after I add all of my gear.

My second concern is, with the M4 and Mid 16 being only a $10 difference, which one would you suggest I use (I will NOT be professionally employing this rifle, ALTHOUGH this rifle will be ran hard and will be used in many training sessions and carbine courses. With my use in mind, which of the two would you suggest)

My 3rd concern is, what added benefit does a mid length gas system on a rifle have as opposed to a standard carbine gas system? which is more reliable?

And finally, if I order one of these rifles today, how long will it take for the rifle to ship out?

Please try to answer all of my questions, It will determine if I make a purchase or not, for this is a serious inquiry.

Thank You!

 

[TedG]

How much of a "weight difference" are you concerned about? The report of better functioning, and better wear, is a good trade-off for the miniscule weight difference. Go for the middy. BCM runs out of stock often, but they restock regularly. Wait for the set-up you really want. Don't settle and just buy something because your first choice is temporarily out of stock.

 

[Palmguy]

You are talking about a matter of ounces...

 

[12131]

You are talking about a matter of ounces...

Yup. With all the gear that the OP is gonna put on, not sure why that matters.:dunno:

 

[Captains1911]

You're basically asking the advantages of a middy to a car. This topic has been covered extensively, try looking around a little.

For me, the main advantage of a mid-length is it allows me to grab the rifle further forward, and provides enough "rail estate" for an X300 and QD sling attachment without compromising useful "hand space", if that makes sense.

The mid-length is more reliable in theory due to the longer gas system resulting in less pressure on the BCG, reducing wear and tear. It's a great theory, I'm not sure how realistic it is considering the car gas system has proven itself plenty reliable.

The middy is also supposed to have less felt recoil for the same reason, I can't tell.

Lastly, if using irons, depending on your setup, the middy may provide a longer sight radius.

 

[boomhower]

Get the middy. Sounds like you could use the room for your stuff. I like it better for the longer site radius personally. Plus I just think it looks better.

 

[JCROWNII]

Yup. With all the gear that the OP is gonna put on, not sure why that matters.:dunno:

Thnks for the useful feedback. You must be very busy.:supergrin:

 

[djegators]

I would consider the BCM middy light weight barrel if lighter is better for you. I think 9" rail will add about 2oz, but going LW barrel will save you about 5oz.....so a middy LW is lighter than a carbine standard.

 

[12131]

Thnks for the useful feedback. You must be very busy.:supergrin:

Pbviously.:supergrin::wavey:

 

[LA_357SIG]

My BCM Midy Mod 2 with Troy drop in rail. Without the sling, Surefire 6P, LaRue mount and loaded Magazine it is almost 8 lbs. I don't have a DI carbine upper to compare weight wise. I doubt 2" of gas tube or handguard will make much of a difference.

 

[K. Foster]

A middy has a slightly softer recoil impulse which causes less wear on parts. How much less wear isn’t really known but it isn’t very much. As far as felt recoil? I have 1 middy and 2 carbines and I can not detect any appreciable difference. Probably the biggest advantage to a middy is a longer sight radius and more rail space.
As far as weight? That will be determined by your rail or hand guard.
In a nut shell, all the advantages go to the middy but the difference isn’t earth shattering.
As to shipping times? Contact the company. Get the info from the source.

 

[K. Foster]

Double post.