All things considered, are the SIG P365 and SIG P320 series of pistols now as drop safe as a Glock? Share any thoughts you have one way or another in the comments.
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
Same here, 320 yes but the 365 no.Never heard that the P365 had a drop safe issue before.
Neither have I, however, no one ever heard of a SIG P320 having a drop issue either for the first three years until it did.Never heard that the P365 had a drop safe issue before.
Although off topic, another amazing shooter is the Beretta PX4 Storm Compact Inox. I converted mine to a reduced profile G-type decocker (no manual safety) and slapped on Ameriglo night sights and a set of Talon Grips and—boy, let me tell you—after owning two dozen concealed carry guns over the years—including six Glocks (Gens 3, 4 & 5) and six M&P's (both 1.0 and 2.0's)—the only gun I like better is my SIG P229 Enhanced Elite (and only marginally and because it is chambered in 9mm, .40 S&W and .357 SIG). The Beretta is about 8 ounces lighter than it, slightly smaller, and less than half the price of my P229. The PX4 Storm is essentially a Glock 26-sized slide on a Glock 19-sized frame and—OMG—it is amazing!I own both and am wondering the same thing.
Both guns are amazing shooters, But I haven’t carried either one yet.
Although off topic, another amazing shooter is the Beretta PX4 Storm Compact Inox. I slapped on a set of Talon Grips and boy, let me tell you, after owning two dozen concealed carry guns over the years, including six Glocks and six M&P's (as well as Walthers, FN's, et al.), the only gun I like better is my SIG P229 Enhanced Elite, and only marginally. The Beretta is about 8 ounces lighter than it, slightly smaller and half the price of my P229. The PX4 Storm is essentially a Glock 26-size slide on a Glock 19-size frame and OMG. I wasn't impressed holding it without Talon Grips, and even the rubberized grips weren't much to write home about, but I put the granulate Talon Grips on recently and I still can't believe it. If everyone shot this gun half the Glock, M&P, and SIG crowd would convert to the PX4 Storm Compact with Ameriglo sights. I still can't believe how awesome this gun is.I own both and am wondering the same thing.
Both guns are amazing shooters, But I haven’t carried either one yet.
A couple of things. First, I'll have to look to see where I found this (ArmyTimes?), but I read last year that, a year after the Department of Defense released its XM17 update in January of 2018—and even though they had reported they had fixed the drop issue (though they also reported the fix caused other issues)—the army ran into other unintentional discharges after the alleged fix (note: the XM17 also never passed its MRBS in either phase 1 or phase 2 testing. The compact failed during the former and the full-size failed with FMJ's in the latter).I'll bet that after what happened with the P320, the P365 was the safest gun Sig could release. Videos showed the gun being dropped at any and every conceivable way without going off. Add to that, the P320 has proven the drop problem to have been successfully resolved.
So did you put them through a test or something, or are you just making that assumption because they didn't accidently go bang?After owning a whole bunch of Glock's over the years, I now own both a P320 and a P365. I find both pistols to be as safe as any striker fired polymer wonder can be. I also find them to have remarkably good triggers, excellent factory sights, and very comfortable grips.
I don't think Glock's backstraps are a match for the SIG's ability to change grip sizes/colors, or calibers on the P320. Glock also has nothing that is even a comparable option to compete with the P365.
How did that testing help prevent the M slides from flying off at the first major placement? New design, or design changes make each gun different, and even though Glock's are reliable, they can release a turd like the G42. There are no angelic companies...I haven't seen either of those guns undergo the testing we've seen Glocks put through over the decades, so there's that too.
As a guy whose pistols don't get dropped out of helicopters, I must admit that I have not put my guns through the same theatrics that we have all seen Glock pistols endure.So did you put them through a test or something, or are you just making that assumption because they didn't accidently go bang?
Kind of like nobody had K'bs in Glocks until they did? FTRB issues? WML reliability issues? Trigger reset issues. LOL... we can play that logic all day long.Neither have I, however, no one ever heard of a SIG P320 having a drop issue either for the first three years until it did.
Aw heck.... let's not forget Glock had to send up a mobile machine shop trailer up to New York for a year to fix all their G19s.How did that testing help prevent the M slides from flying off at the first major placement? New design, or design changes make each gun different, and even though Glock's are reliable, they can release a turd like the G42. There are no angelic companies...
With the P320, the upgrades included a reduced trigger weight and a disconnector, as well as changes to other parts. The source of your information is flawed as the track record since the upgrades has proven the gun to be as safe as the person using it.A couple of things. First, I'll have to look to see where I found this (ArmyTimes?), but I read last year that, a year after the Department of Defense released its XM17 update in January of 2018—and even though they had reported they had fixed the drop issue (though they also reported the fix caused other issues)—the army ran into other unintentional discharges after the alleged fix (note: the XM17 also never passed its MRBS in either phase 1 or phase 2 testing. The compact failed during the former and the full-size failed with FMJ's in the latter).
That said, let's keep in mind that the P365 is another gun (though I assume since it also lacks a trigger safety they went about "solving" the problem in a similar way), it's not exactly like we've seen it thrown out of planes and helicopters like we have seen Glocks.
So are SIG striker-fired guns as safe as Glocks? Without a trigger safety I can't see how, but maybe someone can answer that technical question with proficiency. Even then, hypotheticals don't replace track record.
What I will also say is that SIG originally said that their fix for the P320's drop safety issue was reducing the physical weight (mass) of the trigger to dampen or mitigate the inertia of the trigger upon dropping the gun. Let me be clear, they specifically said originally that no changes were made. Well, a couple of things are fishy about that as well. Although widely reported the SIG had to be dropped on its rear (of the slide), another video demonstrated that is NOT true. Moreover, the videos showed that the trigger didn't move at all in either case, and that the other angle that caused it to fire wouldn't have been remedied by lightening the trigger weight. The changing stories didn't exactly instill confidence (so I passed on buying one).
Well a few months after SIG had claimed they resolved the issue in the consumer market, I had a SIG rep take apart both the old and new system to show me what they changed (he offered), and he pointed out other things besides the physical weight (mass) of the trigger, but without people putting either the P320 or the P365 through the extreme testing we've seen Glocks undergo (and pass), I can't see how anyone can matter-of-factly claim that their striker-fired pistols are as safe as Glocks. I'll drop my P229 from a helicopter all day long without fear it's going to go off, but that is a completely different animal. The truth is that no one can say for sure, but given the track record and merky history surrounding both SIG pistols, I definitely would not assume these SIGs are as drop safe. They may be safe enough, I don't know, but to claim it is as safe is a stretch in my opinion. I haven't seen either of those guns undergo the testing we've seen Glocks put through over the decades, so there's that too.