Anyone carry a +1 or +2 Glock 42 magazine?
If so, what brand is it? Why do you trust it?
I wish Glock OEM made one, but....
If so, what brand is it? Why do you trust it?
I wish Glock OEM made one, but....
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
No worries. I was just wanting to see who "carried" something other than OEM, etc. It's tempting, I'm leaning with staying 100% OEM.Not being an a$$ but I don't understand why you asked.
My wife and I both carry +1 Pearce extensions on our 42's. Not only that but we have 20 +1's on our competition mags for GSSF. Never had a problem out of any of them.
I use the Strike Industries +2 bottom plate. My testing shows that it's completely reliable. Note that SI +2 does not come with a spring. It uses the OEM spring instead, which is long enough to lift 8 rounds. Other extensions come with their own springs sometimes (I don't know about Taran, but Ghost does for sure). I actually bought a Ghost just so I have a longer spring if any unreliability surfaces, but there was no need to install it.Anyone carry a +1 or +2 Glock 42 magazine? If so, what brand is it? Why do you trust it?
Only way you'll really know is to test them out yourself.Appreciate all of the responses. Seems like the magguts +1 is the most common/trusted method, and or the Pierce +1. Keeping my eyes open and only time will tell.
Indeed. I'm currently leaning with staying put with my OEM mags, etc...Only way you'll really know is to test them out yourself.
The other thing is that extensions make the gun less concealable and that's the whole point of a G42 and I also think that while extra ammo is nice, what's more important is to have the determination to survive an armed encounter with only as many rounds as you have available.Indeed. I'm currently leaning with staying put with my OEM mags, etc...
If it aint broke, why fix it? All of my OEM mags run flawless and I trust my life with them.
So to possibly interrupt that for one additional round is my concern. Time will tell.
Indeed. I carry my G42 with the 6-round flush mount. My mag with the extension is my back-up.The other thing is that extensions make the gun less concealable and that's the whole point of a G42 and I also think that while extra ammo is nice, what's more important is to have the determination to survive an armed encounter with only as many rounds as you have available.
If I'm carrying a 5 shot snubby I'm sure as Hell going to make those five shots count. And with a G42 you have seven shots and I want those seven shot to count and that's why I wouldn't carry a 380 unless it could reliably handle the Underwood Plus + 1200 fps 90 gain XTP's.
But...in the meantime do you think you'll be able to walk the streets safely with that mere 6+1 load of mighty 380ACP devastation?Seems like the magguts +1 is the most common/trusted method, and or the Pierce +1. Keeping my eyes open and only time will tell.
I carry my G27 more often, actually. But on certain days, depending on how I'm dressed (it's hot here most of the year), I'll carry the G42. It's an awesome tool and the .380 is an awesome round. Besides, you're getting off topic. Not asking for your advice on a caliber choice. I'm talking to G42 owners and their experience with extended round option for our magazine.But...in the meantime do you think you'll be able to walk the streets safely with that mere 6+1 load of mighty 380ACP devastation?
The persistent never-ending concerns for greater capacity seem to indicate that almost EVERY real-world citizen self-defense event requires emptying several magazines before resolution. In fact, the documented use of even a couple of rounds in such situations is almost nonexistent in the USA. It's the stuff of TV, movies, and internet and gun store Kommandos.
Look...if you are relying on 380ACP as your standard self-defense round then you have far more issues than magazine capacity. Most who rely on a 380ACP autopistol the size of a G42 would be better armed with the lighter Ruger LCR revolver....and get a better round (38SPL) in the upgrade.
I use my 42 for pocket carry at work. The Pearce +1 makes it a teeny bit harder to get out of the pocket. It also makes ir print just a bit more.but why not on the primary mag? Lack of complete trust? Or prefer the OEM flush mount mag for compactness?
If you want more capacity in your back up magazine you might consider the ETS 9 round magazine for the Glock 42. I have one and find it reliable. I also have a number of MagGuts +1 inserts and find them to be reliable.Indeed. I carry my G42 with the 6-round flush mount. My mag with the extension is my back-up.
I love the G42...
I think some folks might find compared to the Glock 42 the Ruger LCR and many of the sub-compact 9 mm semiautos are harder to shoot accurately. For those people it seems to me the 42 is a better choice for them....Most who rely on a 380ACP autopistol the size of a G42 would be better armed with the lighter Ruger LCR revolver....and get a better round (38SPL) in the upgrade.
Precisely. 3 mags, all magguts, not a single problem. And they’re reasonable.All of our G42 mags are +1MagGuts equipped.
Several thousand rounds [combined] and never a single issue.
Trust them like Glock OEM.