Glock Talk banner
  • Notice image

    Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!

21 - 40 of 65 Posts
I really love the Shield. It's my favorite of mine to shoot and I shoot it as well as a full size Glock.

967880
 
  • Like
Reactions: n2g
I have a Gen 1 Shield in 9mm and a 43x. I have a lot of rounds through both. With the 8 round mag in the Shield, they are both have the same grip length. The Shield is thinner and barrel/slide is shorter. The Shield feels smaller and carries tighter to the body for me. The Shield, with the 8 round mag, is about one once heavier that the 43x. I shoot both well and carry the Shield more these days. I carry the Shield with the 8 round mag. When I first got the 43x, I found the factory serrated trigger shoe would tear my trigger finger up after about 100 rounds. I put a regular Gen 3 smooth trigger shoe on it and no trigger finger problems after that. To me, the Shield is more towards the sub compact size to where the 43x is a little toward the compact size. The 43x seems like a smaller version of a Glock 19. I really like the 43x as it fits my hand really well. I do like to carry the 43x as I do not feel under gunned at all with the factory 10 round mags. So, it's a toss up to me. I really like both. Humm, maybe I should just carry both of them.
 
I have a Gen 1 Shield in 9mm and a 43x. I have a lot of rounds through both. With the 8 round mag in the Shield, they are both have the same grip length. The Shield is thinner and barrel/slide is shorter. The Shield feels smaller and carries tighter to the body for me. The Shield, with the 8 round mag, is about one once heavier that the 43x. I shoot both well and carry the Shield more these days. I carry the Shield with the 8 round mag. When I first got the 43x, I found the factory serrated trigger shoe would tear my trigger finger up after about 100 rounds. I put a regular Gen 3 smooth trigger shoe on it and no trigger finger problems after that. To me, the Shield is more towards the sub compact size to where the 43x is a little toward the compact size. The 43x seems like a smaller version of a Glock 19. I really like the 43x as it fits my hand really well. I do like to carry the 43x as I do not feel under gunned at all with the factory 10 round mags. So, it's a toss up to me. I really like both. Humm, maybe I should just carry both of them.
I agree with most of this. The Glocks do ride lower in the hand, and the slide doesn’t feel as top heavy as the Shield does. My preference on that department is the Glocks.

But again, if I had the Shield already, I wouldn’t feel any need to sell it to replace it with the 43/43X
 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
The Shields are nice and I've shot both the 9mm and the 40 Shields. And I've shot the 9mm Shield and the Glock 43 side by side and I actually liked the Shield better but the 43 is more concealable and I like how the Glock field strips better than the Shield.

But now there's a 43X and a Shield Plus and for the larger size of the two guns I'd still prefer the Glock but I'd be tempted to get the Shield plus if they made it in 40 caliber which they could do because other than the grip, it's the same as the regular Shield which is available in both 9mm and 40.. One advantage to the Shield Plus is that with a flush fit 10 round magazine has a shorter grip and is more concealable that the 43x.

And the advantage of the regular Shield over both the Shield Plus and the 43x is that with the flush fit magazine it has a shorter grip and is more concealable that either one, although you give up some ammo capacity. But my feeling is that if you don't have the ability to solve the problem with 8 rounds of carefully aimed ammo, the problem might not be solvable and more ammo does not make you a better shot while less ammo just might make you more determined to make every shot count

But then again, one advantage of the regular shield over the regular G43 is that S&W provides you with factory OEM extended mags that can be carried as spares, and Glock does not, and I don't trust any aftermarket magazines including the 15 round mags that are so popular these days for the G48 and 43x.
I find that some of the "after market" magazines for Glock are much better quality than the factory Glock mags. I've made personal comparisons, and seen online comparisons between Glock mags and Magpul Mags, since I use Magpuls on my G17. They fit better, feed better, eject better, and are just "sturdier" than the Glock Mags. As far as the 8+1 setup with the factory extended mag for the Shield, we just never know, but the likelihood of needing more than 9 rounds in EDC situations just doesn't seem to be a reality. Now, I realize ANY situation could unfold. And I believe in that philosophy, better to have too many than not enough, applies to anything in life. Man, I've been looking like crazy for a 43X and would use one of the new 15 round mags if I could just find it! Meanwhile, lots of situations are resolved with ONE SHOT!!!
 
Nice shooting! This motivates me to get my ass to the range with my Shield and see what I can do at 10 yards.
Thanks. I've been able to keep them in the 9 ring, but I never took pics of that target. I'm not a lights out shooter by any means. I handle this gun well and can anticipate the break of the trigger to get good groups.
 
My Shield Plus is the cat meow, it's in my rotation now but I am a fan of the M&P Shield those I have the old original first Shield 9mm, the 40 S&W, and the .45 Shield, so yeah this new Shield is better to me and I shoot it better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n2g and MrS&W
Those Shields are great pistols but the handle is just to narrow for me. Five years ago I would have never thought I would be complaining about to narrow of a handle on a carry pistol that holds 10-13rds of 9mm but the evolution of the carry pistol is just awesome right now, to bad everything else is crap.
 
And the advantage of the regular Shield over both the Shield Plus and the 43x is that with the flush fit magazine it has a shorter grip and is more concealable that either one, although you give up some ammo capacity.
The Shield Plus and the original Shield are identical in size other than a slight increase in grip width, .95" vs 1.1". The grip length is not longer on the Shield plus.
 
I love both and id take either. I had always wanted to own a Glock when i was younger...owning a full size grip one made me a non glock owner..now that they make a model that fits the human hand well the 43X/48 was my ticket back in and thats what I did.
 
I've carried some form of Shield for about 5 years now. I started with a 1.0 and I have moved on to the Shield Plus, which may well be the last carry gun I buy in this lifetime. They're comfortable to carry & shoot, thoroughly reliable, and put holes where I want 'em. I'm a big fan.
 
I don't think you can go wrong with the shield of any generation, I own a full size 2.0 and absolutely love it! from all the reviews and speaking to people that own them, they love it too, I think you'll find the Ergo's are the best in the business
 
I have an older Shield, and like it. I choose to carry the 365 over it, but I would be well served by the Shield. The Glock (G43/43x/G48) options are great guns, but aren't terribly differentiated in terms of size, capacity, or capability to justify adding them in addition to the Shield.

If you prefer the Glock, I'd keep trying to buy what you want (even if it means waiting for some of the gun frenzy to die down). If you are fine with the Shield, I'd just keep it. Both would serve you quite well. Selling your Shield won't get the same return as you would on a Glock. There are far more out there, and S&W had the fire sale on them where they were selling new for well under $300 with promo's, and people tend to remember the low water mark when deciding what to pay for a used gun. The G43 series never lowered prices to that level (S&W was launching the newer, higher-priced versions of the Shield, and taking revenue from a lower price-point market by shedding an obsolete model, so their strategy made good sense... sell low while protecting margin on updated product lines).

Good luck!
 
I have an older Shield, and like it. I choose to carry the 365 over it, but I would be well served by the Shield. The Glock (G43/43x/G48) options are great guns, but aren't terribly differentiated in terms of size, capacity, or capability to justify adding them in addition to the Shield.

If you prefer the Glock, I'd keep trying to buy what you want (even if it means waiting for some of the gun frenzy to die down). If you are fine with the Shield, I'd just keep it. Both would serve you quite well. Selling your Shield won't get the same return as you would on a Glock. There are far more out there, and S&W had the fire sale on them where they were selling new for well under $300 with promo's, and people tend to remember the low water mark when deciding what to pay for a used gun. The G43 series never lowered prices to that level (S&W was launching the newer, higher-priced versions of the Shield, and taking revenue from a lower price-point market by shedding an obsolete model, so their strategy made good sense... sell low while protecting margin on updated product lines).

Good luck!
I agree, if one isn’t wanting or willing to carry with s15 mags then I too would have a hard time justifying the purchase. Unless like you said, they simply prefer Glock. Then by all means wait and get what you want.
 
I have a G48 and Shield 2.0, love both of them. Laying the Shield on top of the G48 it doesn't look like much of a difference but as others have said the Shield just seems to carry "smaller" and tighter to the body so it's my primary EDC, the G48 has nightstand duty and occasional carry.

The new Shield plus is very tempting to me. I've handled it but not shot it but the slightly increased grip feels great in the hand. I'm not going to rush it but one may eventually find its way into my core group.
 
21 - 40 of 65 Posts