Have you perused these two threads?

https://www.glocktalk.com/threads/h-k-cc9-finally-releases-after-7-years-of-development.2012114/?post_id=32842998#post-32842998

https://www.glocktalk.com/threads/hk-cc9-coming-soon.2010670/?post_id=32810086#post-32810086

 

Yes I did and was looking for a bit more opinions and similar content to what
Villuj_idiot
contributed.

 

How many people do you suppose have CC9s just yet? They are pretty hard to come by at the time being. It may be a while before anyone can offer comparisons. That said, since Glock still doesn't have a real offering in the micro compact 9mm department, the CC9 would have the advantage of actually being a micro 9. The 43x is a great gun, but it is still not a micro 9mm.

 

I know out west we don't have them readily available yet, but I thought there were more of them out east. The size difference between the CC9 and 43X isn't very different.

I guess I will just have to wait and see.

 

Size differences is a bit more than you think:

 

The bottom picture is the one I was trying to copy, it just didn't work for me. What I like to do is line up the guns by the tang, so you get a better idea of length to the trigger. If you use the 12 rd mag the Glock is only longer by the base pad and a half inch in length, which to me isn't much. I actually would have preferred the CC9 to be a bit longer in the barrel.

I don't like two finger grips so my sweet spot is 5" in length.

The 365 is a closer match in size, but I've had them and sold them. For me it will either be the HK or Glock in this category.

 

I'm probably going to grab a CC9 just because, but I'd really like to feel the trigger before I order one. All of my tool guns are Glocks, but I'm not bound to Glock for EDC because there's no cross magazine use with it's bigger brothers.