At the latest gun show they had a bunch of police surplus mags for $9 each ($10 out the door including tax) and I picked up five for a G22 although I don't have a G22. The springs are definitely weak (very easy to load the first five rounds) but I have tested them on my range buddy's G23/22 and they were 100% reliable through 150 rounds. For good measure, I also tested them on my G17 with 50 rounds and they were 100% reliable, this was strange since they are for G22 but them functioned fine in 17 as well.
Do you ever replace springs in mags? Would you trust your life to police surplus mags? Since they are surplus it would follow that an officer was already trusting their life to them but I just wonder.
I have friends with old guns and we have used 1911 and Hi Power mags from WW2 and they are 100% reliable at least at the range... have also used Walther P38 mags from WW2 also 100% reliable. Surplus mags are cheap and abundant and I wonder if there are any reasons to avoid them since in my opinion you can never have too many mags?
Finally, do mags actually go bad if they are not rusty or dirty? I have four colt ar mags from 1970s and they are 100% reliable, the finish is almost completely gone but they never have issues, and they have not been cleaned in at least 20 years... I have plenty of MagPuls which only cost $13 but they just don't have the character of these old mil mags...
I don't mind newish mags but given the price of surplus mags on HK USP 40, Sig 226/220 Beretta 92/96, Ruger P series and Glock 17/22/23 mags is there any reason to avoid surplus especially in Sig mags which seem to cost at least 2-3X what glock mags cost new and surplus mags seem to be $10 in gun shows regardless of brand and they are factory mags... Given what surplus mags cost my friends and I get them even if we don't have the gun but the gun is on our wish list.
Do you ever replace springs in mags? Would you trust your life to police surplus mags? Since they are surplus it would follow that an officer was already trusting their life to them but I just wonder.
I have friends with old guns and we have used 1911 and Hi Power mags from WW2 and they are 100% reliable at least at the range... have also used Walther P38 mags from WW2 also 100% reliable. Surplus mags are cheap and abundant and I wonder if there are any reasons to avoid them since in my opinion you can never have too many mags?
Finally, do mags actually go bad if they are not rusty or dirty? I have four colt ar mags from 1970s and they are 100% reliable, the finish is almost completely gone but they never have issues, and they have not been cleaned in at least 20 years... I have plenty of MagPuls which only cost $13 but they just don't have the character of these old mil mags...
I don't mind newish mags but given the price of surplus mags on HK USP 40, Sig 226/220 Beretta 92/96, Ruger P series and Glock 17/22/23 mags is there any reason to avoid surplus especially in Sig mags which seem to cost at least 2-3X what glock mags cost new and surplus mags seem to be $10 in gun shows regardless of brand and they are factory mags... Given what surplus mags cost my friends and I get them even if we don't have the gun but the gun is on our wish list.