As far as the the Army marksmanship unit experts stated that this is an insignificant problem that can be mitigated with training and experience with the weapon, they were obviously trying to minimize the embarrassment of the pistol the army adopted before completing the required testing.
That is a subjective unsubstantiated conclusion, without any merit. A SME would never jump into a corner like that, what are your qualifications to override the marksmanship unit of the Army? Ignorance begets confidence, and that is the corner you placed yourself in.
Despite tons of efforts to show that Glocks had plenty of issues through the years, that ammo can cause trouble with a perfectly good but not yet calibrated firearm, you are so upset that Austrian perfection has not won against an American company that you will ignore facts, precedents, sleazy marketing tactics, anything to cry over the wunderbar Austrian design from the 80’s.
Today I was talking to a friend, former officer in the Australian Army, and they are also adopting the 320 platform. Surely another twisted test, corrupted Army, the works… or maybe just maybe a modern truly modular platform wins against a 40 years old non modular pistol?
Maybe a company that can provide different frames, optics, suppressors wins against one that does one thing and one thing only and despite having had tons of issues during the years calls it Perfection?