Pics first:
I used a GSSF coupon to get this. At first, I was gonna get a regular 43X. Then all my 43 holsters would be completely compatible. However, while at the shop, I called an audible and went with the MOS. I did my usual “upgrades” which consists of: maritime spring cups, smooth trigger conversion, and night sights. The night sights weren’t the usual Agents or Bolds, as they look awful by hanging off the back. I instead ordered the Trooper set and have been very happy with them. Only knock against them is they don’t have the U-notch, but that isn’t a deal breaker.
Being that this was the MOS version with optic mount and light rail, I knew they wouldn’t sit long unoccupied. I did a bit of research and landed in the Vortex Defender CCW for the optic, and the TLR7 Sub for the WML.
Years ago I tried a TLR6 on my Glock 43. In my opinion, it is hot garbage. Bad ergonomics and not user friendly. Output is poor. I also couldn’t find a holster that it worked well with. The TLR7 Sub is everything the the TLR6 wasn’t. For what it is, it’s great. It’s only 500 likens, but that’s a lot for its size and due to its size, it will always be behind the output of full size WMLs. The controls are easy to reach and manipulate. Streamlight hit a home run with those design.
The Vortex Defender CCW is… okay. I like its size and features. It’s rugged, thought out controls, and easy battery access. However, the dot itself has a slow refresh rate. This isn’t an issue in dry fire or most shooting. However, it becomes an issue in rapid fire. On my Glock 34 I have a Trijicon SRO. In competition, the dot becomes a line in rapid fire during recoil. With this you’re able to see the dot and get it back to where you want it at in rapid fire. With the slow refresh rate if the Defender, in rapid fire you don’t get a line, you get essentially what is a dot graph. Depending on the speed of the gun during recoil, the dots get pretty spaced out. It definitely slows me down as a shooter so I don’t overestimate and lose the dot. So far this isn’t a deal breaker, but I am open to other dot options.
The 43X MOS reminded me of something that I had forgotten I knew: subcompacts aren’t fun to shoot. It’s the same with my 43. I like them as EDCs. They serve in that role great. However, they are not something I really want to shoot many rounds through in a short period. Shoot enough to stay comfortable and proficient, but not much past that. It’s not like a full size gun where they are fun to shoot. I know this isn’t profound, anything new, nor insightful, but it’s what it is.
This 43X was purchased to supplement my EDC as a backpack and hiking gun. In that role it will excel. The plain ol’ 43 has done that for me for a while. However the chance to get a very similar gun with a fuller grip where being as concealable isn’t as big a factor was a good way to spend that GSSF coupon. I’m looking forward to the hikes and trips it will come with on.
Now, I said I wasn’t impressed by it. That’s mostly true. I was expecting it to be a “funner” gun to shoot. It fell short in that. However, in my envisioned utilization of it, it’s meeting and exceeding.
Bottom line: The 43X is more tool than toy.
I used a GSSF coupon to get this. At first, I was gonna get a regular 43X. Then all my 43 holsters would be completely compatible. However, while at the shop, I called an audible and went with the MOS. I did my usual “upgrades” which consists of: maritime spring cups, smooth trigger conversion, and night sights. The night sights weren’t the usual Agents or Bolds, as they look awful by hanging off the back. I instead ordered the Trooper set and have been very happy with them. Only knock against them is they don’t have the U-notch, but that isn’t a deal breaker.
Being that this was the MOS version with optic mount and light rail, I knew they wouldn’t sit long unoccupied. I did a bit of research and landed in the Vortex Defender CCW for the optic, and the TLR7 Sub for the WML.
Years ago I tried a TLR6 on my Glock 43. In my opinion, it is hot garbage. Bad ergonomics and not user friendly. Output is poor. I also couldn’t find a holster that it worked well with. The TLR7 Sub is everything the the TLR6 wasn’t. For what it is, it’s great. It’s only 500 likens, but that’s a lot for its size and due to its size, it will always be behind the output of full size WMLs. The controls are easy to reach and manipulate. Streamlight hit a home run with those design.
The Vortex Defender CCW is… okay. I like its size and features. It’s rugged, thought out controls, and easy battery access. However, the dot itself has a slow refresh rate. This isn’t an issue in dry fire or most shooting. However, it becomes an issue in rapid fire. On my Glock 34 I have a Trijicon SRO. In competition, the dot becomes a line in rapid fire during recoil. With this you’re able to see the dot and get it back to where you want it at in rapid fire. With the slow refresh rate if the Defender, in rapid fire you don’t get a line, you get essentially what is a dot graph. Depending on the speed of the gun during recoil, the dots get pretty spaced out. It definitely slows me down as a shooter so I don’t overestimate and lose the dot. So far this isn’t a deal breaker, but I am open to other dot options.
The 43X MOS reminded me of something that I had forgotten I knew: subcompacts aren’t fun to shoot. It’s the same with my 43. I like them as EDCs. They serve in that role great. However, they are not something I really want to shoot many rounds through in a short period. Shoot enough to stay comfortable and proficient, but not much past that. It’s not like a full size gun where they are fun to shoot. I know this isn’t profound, anything new, nor insightful, but it’s what it is.
This 43X was purchased to supplement my EDC as a backpack and hiking gun. In that role it will excel. The plain ol’ 43 has done that for me for a while. However the chance to get a very similar gun with a fuller grip where being as concealable isn’t as big a factor was a good way to spend that GSSF coupon. I’m looking forward to the hikes and trips it will come with on.
Now, I said I wasn’t impressed by it. That’s mostly true. I was expecting it to be a “funner” gun to shoot. It fell short in that. However, in my envisioned utilization of it, it’s meeting and exceeding.
Bottom line: The 43X is more tool than toy.