My next Glock (god only knows when that will happen) is going to be a 357 Sig I really like the stats plus I like the size of the 19 frame,
what are your pros and cons on this Glock
what are your pros and cons on this Glock
Glocktalk is a forum community dedicated to Glock enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Glock pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, and more!
Don't have any Glocks, just a Smith 442 and a smith model 10 I really want another Glock but I'm torn between a 40 and a 357Don't you have a glock in 40? Boy if there was ever a conversion made in heaven it's the 40 to sig.
Whichever you decide to go with, for another $125 for a Lone Wolf conversion barrel, you'll have both!Don't have any Glocks, just a Smith 442 and a smith model 10 I really want another Glock but I'm torn between a 40 and a 357
This.Get a G23 & the factory G32 barrel, or G32 & the factory G23 barrel..........
And according to some, may be prone to set back moreso than other rounds? Dont know if thats true in real life, but if so, the look isnt worth it IMO...Plus, the bottlenecked round just looks cool
.
Yes, but a 9mm factory barrel will not work in a G23 or G32. I have a Lone Wolf 40-9 just for range use. I trust the factory barrls for carry but not an after market barrelThis.
The .357 SIG is fast, flat and hard hitting. Good hard barrier (steel/glass) penetration and a good reputation as a fight stopper.
To me, it's fun to shoot and has a more enjoyable recoil than .40 S&W. Plus, the bottlenecked round just looks cool
The only real con in my opinion is that name brand FMJ ammo can be pricey (compared to 9mm or .40 S&W), especially shopping locally.
$.34/round is about the cheapest I've seen it. When it drops below $.40/round, I stock up (CDT has Federal AE for $.36 right now).
I heard the first loadings (using 9mm bullets maybe?) had this problem, but no issues recently.And according to some, may be prone to set back moreso than other rounds? Dont know if thats true in real life, but if so, the look isnt worth it IMO...
I wish I had the time to test mine out. I have a 23c with the .22LR AA kit, 40-9 extended barrel which is ported and comped and the 357 SIG barrel which I had ported as well. 4 in 1 :supergrin:Don't you have a glock in 40? Boy if there was ever a conversion made in heaven it's the 40 to sig.
A 135gr bullet in the .40 gets velocities closer to the .357sig 125gr and very close energy levels however the performance between the two bullets is quite different when they hit the target. Take a look at a 135gr .40 bullet sometime, its about as long as it is wide with a rather poor SD. I shoot both .40 and .357sig in my Glocks but a 135gr. bullet is my very last choice for a .40 bullet, especially for self defense.You can shoot 135 grain .40 and its basically a .357 sig round... :whistling:
Any auto round round can exibit setback from repeated chamberings. Setback on a 180gr .40 can be very dangerous due to the long bullet taking up a lot of real estate in the case thus causing major pressure spikes with even a little setback. The .357sig has a somewhat small amount of the case neck gripping the bullet so you can get setback a little easier. Chambering a round several times without measuring and keeping an eye on setback of any auto round is just asking for trouble IMO.And according to some, may be prone to set back moreso than other rounds? Dont know if thats true in real life, but if so, the look isnt worth it IMO...