Joe Biden may become President and now the ATF are dishing out new laws/policies or whatever you want to call it. Any of it seems strange to you ?Last time I checked the ATF was not part of the legislature. Why do we accept them creating law on a whim? They change their minds more often than Imelda Marcos changed shoes, who can keep up with all their BS.
Trump has not lost the election. It is all a media projection based on widespread fraud. Trump won the popular vote in a landslide. The media has no authority to call an election. Zero. The electoral college has not even assembled yet. The GSA calls it and they are waiting. Two large lawsuits were just filed in GA and MI. There are court cases pending and developing. It might go to the SCOTUS or congress even. Biden did not win the election.If this forum represents gun owners No wonder we lost the election
Any infringement on the 2A is the real fight. "The right of the people shall not be infringed."Save up for the real fight. The core of gun ownership. ..
Again. Be careful.
It is not legal to make a pistol from a rifle.
"A weapon made from a rifle is also a firearm subject to the NFA if the weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length."
So the pistol needs to be made from a receiver that was never a rifle or it needs to be a pistol.
But if the 4473 has "rifle" on it, dont make it into a pistol.
while i agree 100% with your sentiment it is not the world we are in right now. The fight is on multiple levels and fronts. You pick a battle you can win and move the correct agenda forward. This is not one of them. Just like the NRA pushing for national CWP reciprocity. Its not going to happen. A better fight would have been state/city level bans on class of firearms, ammunition and magazine restrictions.Any infringement on the 2A is the real fight. "The right of the people shall not be infringed."
It doesn't say "Only the core of the right shall not be infringed...the rest of it is infringeable, and the govt. is free to arbitrarily define and redefine what the core is."
The National Firearms Act and the Gun Control Act gives ATF the authority to issue regulations defining provisions in these laws. ATF regulations define terms in the laws like what is a pistol, sporting use, concealable, etc. So for example, ATF isn't creating a new statute but could redefine the term pistol in existing law to say firearms that weigh greater than xx ounces aren't designed to be fired with one hand. So the AR couldn't then be considered a pistol.Hold on now. How is any of that legal? The law doesn't just change because the ATF says so.
That's only an approval for what was submitted. The brace in question here was made by IWI not SBT. This approval letter affirmed that three submitted firearms, as assembled constitute "firearms". None of the items listed were made by SBT.