close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Would you get a new M&P Shield in .40S&W?

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by Roger G23, May 13, 2012.

Tags:
  1. Roger G23

    Roger G23 Glock Guy

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,143
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    The Gunshine State
    I learned the hard way about the .40S&W round and small subcompact pistols. I found the G27 basically uncontrollable for follow up shots with the flush baseplate. Switched to the G26 and happiness.
    Still wanted a .40S&W subcompact though. Gave the M&P40c a shot and glad I did. It really handles the .40 very nicely even with flush baseplates.
    What about the new Shield? Do you think it will handle the .40 pretty well? Or do you think a slim pistol like this is really designed for the 9mm?
     
  2. TxGlock9

    TxGlock9

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,016
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    TEXAS
    Contrary to conventional thought I think the slimness of the M&P shield will actually help with the recoil of the 40sw. Reason being the purchase on the gun will be a lot more secure. The recoil however will be greater due to it's lighter weight. Just my .02.
     

  3. TalkToTheGlock

    TalkToTheGlock Zombie Hunter

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    My friend and LGS owner has a .40S&W daily and has put 500 rounds through it and states the recoil isn't bad at all. He said it is definitely better and more controllable than the G27. I'm thinking about picking one up.
     
  4. dnuggett

    dnuggett PRO 2A

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,153
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    DFW TX
    No, had the chance yesterday and I passed on it.
     
  5. Wurger

    Wurger

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    80
    I have the G27 (and G26)and 9mm Shield........Happy with the G27 except for the width in pocket carry. I may go for the .40 Shield and sell which one of the Shields I like the least.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2012
  6. Folsom_Prison

    Folsom_Prison Brew Crew

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    27,635
    Likes Received:
    4,873
    Location:
    Midwest
    Nope I wouldn't, I'm not a big Fawty fan.
     
  7. TxGlock9

    TxGlock9

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,016
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    TEXAS
    :rofl:
     
  8. Cole125

    Cole125 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,584
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Far West, USA
    Not a chance. .40 has little advantage over 9mm with modern +p SD loads and it brings with it more recoil and muzzle flip and less capacity. No thanks.
     
  9. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    22,477
    Likes Received:
    4,123
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Not a fan of .40 in these smaller guns. The .40 Walther PPS has a lot of negative feedback about recoil, I wouldn't expect miracles from the Shield.
     
  10. Dan Glock

    Dan Glock

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    x2!!!
     
  11. TSAX

    TSAX USAF Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    10,162
    Likes Received:
    7
    I would try and test fire it first or at least wait for more feedback about the recoil. For me the PPS in .40 was a good example of a
    a snappy and unpleasant shooting gun. I hope the Shield in .40 is a much better gun.






    :50cal:
     
  12. mrsurfboard

    mrsurfboard The Anti-Glock

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    NJ
    +3 :supergrin:
     
  13. collim1

    collim1 Shower Time!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    8,582
    Likes Received:
    2,578
    Location:
    USA
    In a gun that size I would appreciate the softer recoil and extra round of the 9mm offering.
     
  14. ShipWreck

    ShipWreck Beretta 92 Nut!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,537
    Likes Received:
    209
    Location:
    Texas
    I have one in 9mm and like it. Shot placement is king. Why not get the 9mm. No matter what, it WILL be more controllable. 1 handed, I was very impressed with doubletaps with the 9mm version
     
  15. CajunBass

    CajunBass Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,401
    Likes Received:
    600
    Location:
    North Chesterfield, Virginia
    No...but then I wouldn't buy anything else in 40 either.
     
  16. BuckyP

    BuckyP Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,245
    Location:
    PA
    Heck, I'm to the point I'd get one in .41 AE if I could find one. :sigh:

    All kidding aside, the 9mm is what people have and loads of good reports about them, so that's what I'll eventually be getting.
     
  17. Kanin

    Kanin Savage Warrior

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Skagos
    I like 40 as a round, but I'm sticking with the 9mm in the Shield.
     
  18. Aahzz

    Aahzz Who?

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2001
    Messages:
    458
    Likes Received:
    68
    Location:
    Union, KY
    What he said.
     
  19. Pred8tory

    Pred8tory Retired Copper Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2002
    Messages:
    791
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    Metro Cleveland
    No. My Glock 27 is totally dependable and holds 10 rounds.
     
  20. ChicagoZman

    ChicagoZman

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Indiana
    Even though I own several .40s, in a gun the size of the Shield probably not.