close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Veterans Receive Letters From VA Prohibiting Ownership or Purchase of Firea

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by Raz-n-co, Feb 22, 2013.

  1. ray9898

    ray9898

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    14,905
    Likes Received:
    2,617
    Location:
    Georgia
    Of course....this is nothing new and is a longstanding diagnosis. Anyone who is adjudicated as "incompetent", veteran or not, is the very definition of what is considered a seriously mentally ill person. Not only can they no longer own guns but they can no longer make any decisions for them self, a caretaker will be placed in charge of all their affairs including finances and other important life decisions. These are the people who would have been institutionalized just a couple of decades ago.

    This is not some lax standard they just throw around, it is a very serious diagnosis which must be proven and may be contested. Very few people reach this level and it pretty much encompasses the very top end of the scale which includes people who just cannot function in society in their present state.


    It is what is referred to in question F on the Federal 4473.

     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2013

  2. volsbear

    volsbear IWannaBeSedated Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Messages:
    11,457
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    Illinois
    As long as the diagnosis is legit, I don't have a problem with these people being exluded from ownership.
     
  3. JAS104

    JAS104 NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2012
    Messages:
    4,545
    Likes Received:
    255
    Location:
    USA
    Anyone remember Ft.Hood?
     
  4. FullClip

    FullClip NRA Benefactor CLM

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,801
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    On The Lake in The Maine Woods
    I tried reading the clip from the VA letter and am left a little confused. I'd like to be able to see the letter in it's entire form.

    I'm a veteran.

    I never saw anything close to combat (other than fights between us engine room crew members against the 'forward pukes' about what movie would be played that night) during my stint in the Navy.

    But if this letter sounds like it is to a vet who is getting VA benefits for PTSD or some other mental issue.
     
  5. JAS104

    JAS104 NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2012
    Messages:
    4,545
    Likes Received:
    255
    Location:
    USA
    I agree. Doesnt really look like its something sent to every veteran, probably only individuals under psychiatric care for PTSD, etc.
     
  6. ray9898

    ray9898

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    14,905
    Likes Received:
    2,617
    Location:
    Georgia

    Not simply those being treated for PTSD, depression, ect....this is the most serious cases where the person is so ill a caregiver must be appointed for them because they cannot function in society by them self.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2013
  7. FullClip

    FullClip NRA Benefactor CLM

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,801
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    On The Lake in The Maine Woods
  8. nursetim

    nursetim

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    17,661
    Likes Received:
    14,695
    Location:
    liberalville N. M.
    Has anybody YOU know, actually received this letter?
     
  9. PicardMD

    PicardMD Make It So!!

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    1,299
    Location:
    Star Fleet Medical...
    This is a mental health issue, not a veterans issue.
    Being a veteran does not give one any special rights to circumvent mental health prohibitions in gun ownership.

    Using VA's and veterans in this way to promote gun rights is dishonest, and no better than the anti-gun crowd's dishonest tactics.

    A 70 yo guy with dementia and paranoid behaviors should not be allowed to own guns, for the same reason he shouldn't be allowed to drive or be left alone in a house with working stoves. I don't care if he is a highly decorated war veteran with a chest full of medals. I am grateful for his service to our country and I will do everything medically possible to help him. But no, he shouldn't own guns and he shouldn't be paraded out by us for "gun rights." Doing so is just as bad as Obama dragging Newtown or Aurora victims out for his gun control agenda.

    A 36 yo guy with severe PTSD who is prone to violent outbursts should not be allowed to own guns. I don't care if he was a Tier One operator who has kept our country safe by killing many terrorists. I am grateful for his service to our country and will do everything I can to help him. But no, he shouldn't own guns at this point and shouldn't be used as a puppet by us for "gun rights."
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2013
  10. Bruce M

    Bruce M

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    48,779
    Likes Received:
    25,392
    Location:
    S FL

    Thank you for a well written post that was obviously well thought out.
     
  11. Bushflyr

    Bushflyr ʇno uıƃuɐɥ ʇsnɾ Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 1999
    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Western WA
    How did you manage to get ~4.3 billion posts?

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2013
  12. ray9898

    ray9898

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    14,905
    Likes Received:
    2,617
    Location:
    Georgia
    Strange.
     
  13. BobbyS

    BobbyS Truth always sounds like lies to a sinner

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    10,983
    Likes Received:
    8,327
    Location:
    Boonies New Mexico

    What about the 36 yr. old guy that doesn't have PTSD who is prone to violent outbursts? Nobody has any paper on him. Those are the guys to worry about. The thousands upon thosands of military PTSD people obviously have not went out and killed thousands of people. If they were so volatile, as it appears most think they are, why haven't we seen the thousands of killings that their numbers would bring?
     
  14. nursetim

    nursetim

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    17,661
    Likes Received:
    14,695
    Location:
    liberalville N. M.
    Bobby, I don't think Jean Luc was being as general as you are. He seems to be making a specific point. His point is, and correct me if I'm wrong Jean Luc, anyone with serious mental health issues does not need to have access to guns. Be they Audie Murphy or joe smuckatelli. Thank you for your service, now let us take care of you and help you get better. If we don't, then shame on us.
     
  15. BobbyS

    BobbyS Truth always sounds like lies to a sinner

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    10,983
    Likes Received:
    8,327
    Location:
    Boonies New Mexico

    I want to know how the hell you knew I was Audie Murphy.


    Edit: I also agree with both of you that people that ARE whack jobs should not have a gun. I just have issue with the generalization that all these vets people talk about are all whacko.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2013
  16. JuneyBooney

    JuneyBooney

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    18,216
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    The problem I have with it is that there are people who want to kill people that have done them wrong but not hurt others. This in my arguments makes them not dangerous. Why do humans have to act like sheep? :upeyes: If a vet is that bad off he would probably be in the horsepital.
     
  17. Bill Keith

    Bill Keith

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    3,677
    Likes Received:
    1,344
    Location:
    Humble, TX
    A determination of incompetency is made by a court and is not that easy to get. Incompetent means "Incompetent"
    either through severe mental illness or physical disability such that you can't manage your own affairs.
     
  18. JackMac

    JackMac

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    TX
    A court should make the call, not the VA. A judicial official should, based upon the evidence, decide whether the person is a danger to himself or others, not the VA. If you are a vet and have a ptsd diagnosis and have a person appointed to handle your $, typically your spouse, then expect a Brady letter brother. There was a bill introduce two years ago by NC Senator Burr....the Veterans' Firearms Rights Restoration Bill or some such name. Never went anywhere
     
  19. BlackPaladin

    BlackPaladin

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,259
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    I am a Veteran, this is not a Vet issue it has already been discussed.

    What is important everyone, is LOOK AT THE OPs POST COUNT.

    Holy frick.