close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

V-35B Carrier Trials

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by G19Tony, Oct 2, 2012.

  1. Rabbi

    Rabbi The Bombdiggity Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    27,503
    Likes Received:
    9,899
    Location:
    San AntonioTexas
    Either that or a Wasp class. I dont know which one. Similar ships though.
     
  2. AngryPanda

    AngryPanda Is he a troll?

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,515
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know it is old news by now, but anytime I see a fixed wing hovering I want to yell "No! You can't do that! It's not allowed!

    Really cool tech going on
     

  3. Bushflyr

    Bushflyr ʇno uıƃuɐɥ ʇsnɾ Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 1999
    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Western WA
    Probably the Wasp. At least it was printed on the backs of a few shirts.

    Extremely cool plane, but seems to me to be the answer to an unasked question. With all the overruns and mismanagement in the program it wouldn't surprise me if they pulled the plug all together.
     
  4. SC Tiger

    SC Tiger Big, educated kitty cat!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    21,674
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Cool plane. I wonder if future Amphibious Assault Ships will utilize the "ski jump" like the British carriers have? Of course, since the Harrier was able to utilize this as well, I would think we would have already done it.

    The British think we're nuts for spending so much money on a single carrier, since bad weather can foul up air operations. However, the ability to park the equivalent of the average nation's entire air force off the coast is never a bad thing.
     
  5. exmdshooter

    exmdshooter WWJMBD?

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.!!!
    ...and also on the aircraft's tail.
     
  6. MtBaldy

    MtBaldy Obie Wan, RIP

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    10,921
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    At the beach
    Cool video. And yes, the ship appears to be USS Wasp.
     
  7. Glock30Eric

    Glock30Eric .45 ACP

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    3,353
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Maryland
    I think we should ditch F-35 and to upgrade F-18s, A-10s, F-16s, F-15s; and keep producing F-22s.

    I really don't think F-35 will bring us a good result. It is problemic plane. This plane has a serve drag issue and it isn't versatility like F-18, A-10, F-16, and F-22. I have seen F-35 personally and it's really big and fat.
     
  8. WarCry

    WarCry

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    9,600
    Likes Received:
    1,087
    Except that the -18, -10, -16, and -22 don't have the V/STOL capability of the -35 that is desired, and the -10, -16, and earlier versions of -18 are designs that need to be replaced.

    With what you're saying, we'd still be trying to upgrade F-111s, F-104s, F-4Bs, etc. At some point you HAVE to design new equipment, not just try to keep patching the holes with upgrades. Some of the current designs are in the area of 40 years old.
     
  9. tslex

    tslex

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Paradise
    Well nifty as all heck to see that plane taking off without a cat and landing vertically.

    That said, still some kinks to work out for this to be a serious player on carrier decks in operational conditions. STOVL capabilties notwithstanding, you want something with a working tailhook, no?

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/feature/132029/lockheed-tries-f_35c-damage-control.html

    An inherent problem, given the way the aft/center nozzle has to be able to deflect. But one I suspect is fixable.

    all that said, and nifty as the plane is, I cannot help but think back a generation to the Harrier. Again, a swell platform -- but the huge fuel demands inherent in STOVL (let alone VTOL) operations meant the plane mostly operated conventionally and was limited even so.
     
  10. Glock30Eric

    Glock30Eric .45 ACP

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    3,353
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Maryland
    We really don't need V/STOL because we have many other tools to do the job. We have V-22s and Air Force to back us up. Honest I could understand the verstability of V/STOL but it comes with a high maintenance to keep them running and I don't see it in cost justification. How many of those have seen in combat, beside UKs?

    I was saying to upgrade -10, -15, -16, and -18 in everything and to reproduce them. That includes new and stronger frame, better jets, better techs, and new features on those planes.
     
  11. SC Tiger

    SC Tiger Big, educated kitty cat!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    21,674
    Likes Received:
    7,102
    Location:
    South Carolina
    No one has asked the real question:

    Can it hover around New York and chase John McClane around? What happens if he jumps on top of it?
     
  12. Bushflyr

    Bushflyr ʇno uıƃuɐɥ ʇsnɾ Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 1999
    Messages:
    3,532
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Western WA
    Scrap the 35. Scrap the 16 and 15. They have about a 10 second life expectancy in a fight with an F-22. (For real) Keep the A-10. There's nothing in the current arsenal so perfectly suited to the asymmetric missions in the middle east. And, obviously, keep the 22.

    The next generation fighters will be drones. "Dog fights" simply don't happen any more. AWACS. Point and click from 100 miles away. Done. Manned fighters will go the way of the dodo.

    He gets sucked into the lift fan and chopped into little itty bitty pieces. Bad guy escapes. Everyone dies happily ever after.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2012
  13. fnfalman

    fnfalman Chicks Dig It

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2000
    Messages:
    52,591
    Likes Received:
    5,235
    Location:
    California & New Mexico, US
    Gunboat Diplomacy at its finest. It worked four hundred years ago and it still work now.
     
  14. superhornet

    superhornet

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    florida
    Three different versions of JSF, Navy, Marines and Air Force. Navy TMS of course will use cat and trap, and is a beefed up version to take the shock. F18 pipeline has been extended to meet delta demand for fall back of delivery schedule of the JSF, which has slipped to the right some years.