Glock Forum - GlockTalk banner
1 - 20 of 24 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
22 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I just picked up this G26 Gen2.5 on Saturday, and I have a few questions.

The story goes that the original owner purchased the pistol circa 1995 and fired approximately 50 rounds through it then cleaned the barrel and it's been in a safe ever since.

First, there is a copper-colored substance in small amounts on several areas of both the slide and frame. I thought that I read somewhere that this substance was from the factory and is usually cleaned off the pistol after the first good cleaning. Is that true?

Second, the magazines both have "+" bases. One has a basic "+" while the other has what appears to be an original "+2" base. Would these have been original to the pistol, or have these been added (or mags switched out) at some point??

Third, there is no magazine loader. Would the G26 have come with a mag loader, or are the G26 mags so short that a mag loader would not have been needed / included???

Fourth, and last for now, the serial number is BRU104US. The best I can come up with is an approximate year of 1995, which would jive with the original owner's information. Can anyone here tell me what date this pistol was "born" on????

Thanks all for any information you can offer me. I'm really excited to function fire this pistol, and use it off duty.

Cheers,
---Brian
 

Attachments

·
Aslan
Joined
·
1,220 Posts
Congrats on your find from a huge 26 fan! The copper colored substance is of Glock factory origin. No need to clean it off. The longer it stays, the better.

Others more knowledgeable than I will no doubt reply to your remaining questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jersey Devil

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,106 Posts
My 1994 G21 came with a mag loader as well as my 1997 G27 2.5

FYI, if for any reason you swap the RSA, please keep the original and make sure the new one does not have issues fully closing the slide. See this thread

http://www.glocktalk.com/threads/g27-2-5-and-gen-4-rsa.1446146/

There have been 3 versions of RSA's for the 26/27. The first version had a voluntary recall from Glock because the base would some times crack.

Enjoy that G26. I still like my G27 2.5 very much.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,990 Posts
Congrats on the "old" 26. Answers 2 question1: yes that copper stuff is a factory "lube" and it backs up the lack of use by the prior owner...good stuff. Q2: yes those mag base plates are an add on by the previous owner. The last 2 questions I can't answer but it appears someone got #3 already. I wouldn't sweat the loader, I have a bunch of them but don't use them.

At the very least you've got an older model thats in great shape and thats a win
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,390 Posts
I have a 2.5 gen G-26 BRU xxx also. Oct-Nov 1995 production.
As new yours still has the anti seize grease in it, mine a LEO G-26 came with two mags one flat one (+) unmarked base. Glock + base part 7151 is stock for your gun. So ones original one added later marked +2 part 1967. They are made slick sided too to match.
Glock made them just for the 2.5 gens. Even today they never made them with a checkered look.

I don't know my serial #off hand other than BRU, but mines a blue label LEO pistol. PM me and we can compare. Mine also has Meprolite N/S. And of course came with a mag loader.
I can send you the correct 483 marked mag loader. Is your box a blue or white label?
Ps I can get 13 rounds in my bigger + bottom.
How much did you pay?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,833 Posts
FYI, if for any reason you swap the RSA, please keep the original and make sure the new one does not have issues fully closing the slide. See this thread

http://www.glocktalk.com/threads/g27-2-5-and-gen-4-rsa.1446146/
Barry, I'm not sure I understand that thread.

I think there you are saying that:
1. Glock replaced the original RSA in 2012 with one marked 0-8. It caused problems returning the slide to battery and resulted in two failures to fire.
AND
2. You replaced that RSA with a pre-2012 RSA (unmarked?) that corrected the problems.

The current RSA for the G26/27/33 is marked 0-8-1. I have not had any problems with it in my Gen2.5 G27.
I still like my G27 2.5 very much.
I like mine too, now that it's got a G33 barrel in it. The original .40SW barrels in the Gen2.5 G27 are from the "kaboom" era of Glock .40SW barrels, and lack full case support. That was a good excuse to convert to the excellent .357SIG cartridge.:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,388 Posts
I always thought G26 always had the dual spring RSA.

Your mags are Glock. The base plates were added by the original owner I would bet.

The gold copper lube should stay, but, do lube your 26 where indicated before you shoot it, the copper grease helps to break in the metal to metal spots where the gun contacts metal to metal.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,833 Posts
On the OP's 1995 G26, even if has fired zero rounds since it was sold, I would replace as a minimum:

1. RSA. Current version is marked 0-8-1. This is the part that most commonly wears out. The design has been improved as well.
2. Coil trigger spring. This is the part that most often breaks.
3. Slide lock spring. That old leaf spring will be significantly deformed, compared to a new spring.

Other updates to consider:
4. Slide stop lever and spring. The wire spring weakens, which can cause premature slide stop before the magazine is empty.
5. Trigger with trigger bar, and trigger mechanism housing. The current parts have improved attachment points for the coil trigger spring that reduce hook failure of part 2 above.
6. Magazine springs. Just because. :)

All of the above OEM parts are very inexpensive.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,833 Posts
I always thought G26 always had the dual spring RSA.
They have. ALL subcompacts of all calibers have always used the captured dual-spring RSAs since the first ones came out in 1995.

However, those RSAs have been improved in design several times since introduction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jersey Devil

·
Registered
Joined
·
22 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Thank you all for the information and advice.

I have an order coming from Glock directly, but many of the parts that are suggested for me to get herein don't seem to be available from them.

I did some reading and several people have stated to be careful when ordering Glock OEM parts. Apparently there are some frauds out there. Is this true? If so, may I ask where / who are good suppliers for authentic Glock OEM parts??

I'm a big believer in keeping the original parts (unless broken), so I'll be sure to keep a baggie of the original parts that came with the pistol in its case.

Thanks again for all the great info and advice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,390 Posts
Ok I took a pic of mine BRU549 but can't post it till I get back to work Sunday so stay tuned.
Pm me your addy and I'll send you a correct mag loader to complete your kit.
I don't carry mine ask carry a 2.5 yen G-27 BSA prefix.
On e bay as mentioned replacement parts are out there but an original 2.5 gen RSA is different. I got a current one for my G-27, had problems, got an early one and all is well. Thanks to Glocktalk members like Buckshot showing me the way. Carry it and trust your and your families life on it. No need to upgrade to a newer one if this one works fine.
I am about to head out to BW3, I guess since I got it out for a pic I may as well take it with me for some WINGS!
It's loaded with 124 (+P) gr SPEER GDHP.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
104 Posts
I did some reading and several people have stated to be careful when ordering Glock OEM parts. Apparently there are some frauds out there. Is this true? If so, may I ask where / who are good suppliers for authentic Glock OEM parts??
First of all, that's a great find on a very old gun! I can only be so lucky to find such a score! I usually get my OEM parts from Brownells, Glockparts.com, Top Gun Supply, or ebay seller "ecop." The first three have been around for awhile and they're definitely gtg.
 

·
1911 lover
Joined
·
10,174 Posts
FYI I love the gen2 glocks.... way older than yours.. the one on my hip right now is serial AMYxxx from around 1992 or so. I have others much older..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,847 Posts
"QUOTE"
The copper colored substance is of Glock factory origin. No need to clean it off. The longer it stays, the better.

WHY??
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,106 Posts
Barry, I'm not sure I understand that thread.

I think there you are saying that:
1. Glock replaced the original RSA in 2012 with one marked 0-8. It caused problems returning the slide to battery and resulted in two failures to fire.
AND
2. You replaced that RSA with a pre-2012 RSA (unmarked?) that corrected the problems.

The current RSA for the G26/27/33 is marked 0-8-1. I have not had any problems with it in my Gen2.5 G27.

I like mine too, now that it's got a G33 barrel in it. The original .40SW barrels in the Gen2.5 G27 are from the "kaboom" era of Glock .40SW barrels, and lack full case support. That was a good excuse to convert to the excellent .357SIG cartridge.:)
Mike,

Yes, you read my post correctly.

So I went and looked at the 2012 RSA that Glock Smyrna installed and it is marked 0-8

Then I looked at my circa 2014 G26 Gen 3 and it's RSA is marked 0-8-1

Doing a slight slide retraction test with all 3 RSA's in my G27 2.5 seem to have the same closure force. I'll have to do a range test to see if the slide fully closed issue still exists with the newest RSA.

Thanks so much for bringing this up.
 
1 - 20 of 24 Posts
Top