Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by HerrGlock, Apr 26, 2013.
I say the liberals do not support this author. 90% of them want guns to be legally carried by lawful citizens. Lawful citizens should be free to use them for self protection, anywhere.
I do not believe he is speaking for the majority of U.S. citizens. He is spouting anti-Constitution rhetoric to stir up things in the political community, and has no facts to enforce his arguments.
See, I can do it too. Just ignore the rights of others.
The Constitution and it's amendments spell out specific civil rights that exist for each and every United States Citizen. These civil right also include the right to keep and bear arms. This is a civil right afforded to all lawful U.S. citizens.
This "person" is advocating the removal of the civil rights from a segment of the population, because of his personal prejudices. The desire of people like him to take away the civil rights from people qualified under the 2nd Amendment, is no different than if he wanted to take away the civil rights of people of color, those of lower economic class, or women.
He represents a segment of the population that wants to reduce some citizens to second class status so they can feel superior and control those that disagree with him.
He is the problem. He advocates taking away our civil rights. Throw him under the bus.
"Civil rights include those rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, including the right to due process, equal treatment under the law of all people regarding enjoyment of life, liberty, property, and protection."
"On September 25, 1789, the First Congress of the United States therefore proposed to the state legislatures 12 amendments to the Constitution that met arguments most frequently advanced against it. The first two proposed amendments, which concerned the number of constituents for each Representative and the compensation of Congressmen, were not ratified. Articles 3 to 12, however, ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, constitute the first 10 amendments of the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights."
The 2ND Amendment to the Constitution is a is a Civil Right.
This is completely fallacious assignment of blame. It's the anti's who have blood on their hands. They have wrongfully made enemies and criminals out of law abiding citizens, and while all the negative attention has been on us, the distraction afforded the real enemies a perfect, wide-open opportunity to attack us and take innocent lives.
They can continue to blame who they want on false, deceptive, divisive, emotional rhetoric, but the fact is that the admin was complacent, and the blood is on their hands.
What a POS. .
At least all of the comments are pro-RKBA
If that is the case Hillary has blood on her hands from Bengazi
Ziegler sounds like a commie sympathiser. We know he's a liar. Wonder what he's going to do when Obama is out of office. What lies will he spread then? And yeah, AZson is right, Hillary has blood on her hands also.
The NRA does indeed have blood on it's hands--it's the blood of hundreds of law-breaking perpetrators annually who are thwarted, wounded and/or killed by 2nd-amendment-believing Americans who don't cower in fear but stand up and defend themselves.
The NRA is also responsible for the sinking of The Titanic, The UFO recovered in Roswell NM, the Hindenburg disaster, and my ingrown toe nails!