The Left’s Battle Plan to Fight SCOTUS Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Gets Leaked

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by cbetts1, Sep 26, 2020.

  1. cbetts1

    cbetts1

    Messages:
    3,997
    Likes Received:
    6,566
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Location:
    AUSTIN, TX
    The roaring fight over SCOTUS nominee Amy Comey Barret is already under way. Thing is, we now know the specific battle plan of the left. We have got our hands on the SCOTUS Rapid Response Action Guide.

    Check out the link yourself: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17F6RSRNp_L3ihulD1WgdPbBugK2XXX2lsO6JqK207o0/mobilebasic

    Let’s watch and see just how much of this battle plan plays out in the next hours, days and weeks. How much of the astroturf protests blanket our country. How much of the specific language is used by the mainstream media and talking heads that would love for you to believe they have an original thought.

    The Primary Hashtag of the Hour, say the overlords: #LetThePeopleDecide. Just don’t let the people decide on their own hashtags.

    The “Slogans for Action Art” you’ll see have already been dictated.

    No Confirmation Until Inauguration

    Let the People Decide

    Our Future, Our Justice

    I Don’t Want Your Nominee, I Want (FILL IN THE BLANK)
    Breonna Taylor
    Racial Justice
    Reproductive Freedom
    A Green New Deal
    COVID Testing



    The Talking Points
    Like zombie mockingbirds you will hear — you are hearing — these talking points:

    • With voting already underway, it should be left up to the American people to decide who gets to nominate the next Supreme Court justice.
    • No nomination should advance or be voted on before the 2021 Inauguration.
    • Senate leadership needs to prioritize economic relief for the millions of people who are suffering after having lost their jobs and are struggling to pay rent and feed their families, not play politics with a rushed Supreme Court nomination process.
    • The Supreme Court makes rulings that shape all of our lives—everything from abortion to segregation, transgender rights to climate change, big money in politics to healthcare. It is unacceptable and unjust to try to rush through a nomination less than 40 days from the election.
    • We must rise up to demand that US Senators stand on the right side of history and let the people decide on the next Supreme Court Justice of this country. We must demand no nomination before inauguration. It’s our future and we should get to choose our justice.
    • We must get our way our else!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (They only think that one.)
    Did you see the contradiction? The left is saying both “The Senate confirming a justice that will help determine America’s future is a somber, serious responsibility” AND “The Senate has better things to do with its time.”

    The powers also warn: “Do not lead with data.” Translation: Stay away from facts.

    Source:
    https://stream.org/the-lefts-battle-plan-to-fight-scotus-nominee-amy-coney-barrett-gets-leaked/
     
    Will Beararms likes this.
  2. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Messages:
    63,049
    Likes Received:
    59,241
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    • With voting already underway, it should be left up to the American people to decide who gets to nominate the next Supreme Court justice.
    • The already made that decision in November of 2016.
    • No nomination should advance or be voted on before the 2021 Inauguration.
    • See above.
    • Senate leadership needs to prioritize economic relief for the millions of people who are suffering after having lost their jobs and are struggling to pay rent and feed their families, not play politics with a rushed Supreme Court nomination process.
    • Then why have the Democrats been blocking the COVID relief that they don't want to clear the house until after the election?
    • The Supreme Court makes rulings that shape all of our lives—everything from abortion to segregation, transgender rights to climate change, big money in politics to healthcare. It is unacceptable and unjust to try to rush through a nomination less than 40 days from the election.
    • See above, we've already had the election for the President and Senate who are supposed to fill this vacancy.
    • We must rise up to demand that US Senators stand on the right side of history and let the people decide on the next Supreme Court Justice of this country. We must demand no nomination before inauguration. It’s our future and we should get to choose our justice.
    • Same thing.
    Basically, all they've got to say is "the next president should decide" but this is "the next president" - none of them are giving a reason the 2020 President is more "the people's choice" than the 2016 President.
     
    Will Beararms, MFC4, n2g and 2 others like this.

  3. pittpa

    pittpa What did I come in here for?

    Messages:
    10,713
    Likes Received:
    22,429
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Location:
    Fortress of Solitude on 11th floor - SW PA 'burbs
  4. ChuteTheMall

    ChuteTheMall Wallbuilder and Weapon Bearer

    Messages:
    115,037
    Likes Received:
    307,508
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Location:
    Colluder in Cahoots
    She would only be the second heterosexual white woman appointed by a GOP President. :elephant:
     
    mike from st pe and Ross-in-Pa like this.
  5. happyguy

    happyguy Man, I'm Pretty

    Messages:
    29,777
    Likes Received:
    33,548
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Location:
    You can't get here from there!
    This woman is a solid 2a defender.

    Godspeed Amy!

    Regards,
    Happyguy :)
     
    MFC4, inthefrey and orangejeep06 like this.
  6. happyguy

    happyguy Man, I'm Pretty

    Messages:
    29,777
    Likes Received:
    33,548
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Location:
    You can't get here from there!
    Per "Guy" on the radio she dissented in a recent 7th Circuit Court of Appeals case in which a nonviolent felon was convicted of possession of a firearm. The majority affirmed the conviction and loss of rights.

    She dissented, saying a there was no compelling reason to strip the individual of that constitutional right for a nonviolent offense. Essentially she sided against the GCA of 1968.

    Regards,
    Happyguy :)
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2020
  7. Pete Perfection

    Pete Perfection

    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2018
    Location:
    Arizona
    She sure is purtty.
     
    MFC4 likes this.
  8. MFC4

    MFC4 Civil Liberties Matter

    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    6,541
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2018
    I actually logged in to get the skinny on her 2A positions haha! FILL THAT SEAT!
     
    ThatGuyYouKnow and happyguy like this.
  9. WayneJessie

    WayneJessie

    Messages:
    6,863
    Likes Received:
    7,068
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    I hope you are correct and that she’s going to be a strict Constitutionalist. John Roberts makes me expect the worse and hope for the best.
     
    MFC4 likes this.
  10. camelsfly

    camelsfly Previously Lloyd Elliott

    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    327
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2017
    Location:
    Georgia
    We had better pray she is a staunch non waivering defender of 2A. If not the Republic is going to be in deep poo.
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2020
    WayneJessie likes this.
  11. BlueBacker

    BlueBacker

    Messages:
    8,120
    Likes Received:
    18,153
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Location:
    America
  12. Tuner Sandwich

    Tuner Sandwich

    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    4,158
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2020
    Who cares what Democrats think (or "feel").

    They have no power, and no say in the matter at hand.

    If we got the votes, fill the seat.

    Democrats are going to beach and whine no matter what happens. Leave them to their irrelevancy. I'm sure there's a city around here somewhere they haven't burned yet.