Tamron 17-55 opinions?

Discussion in 'Through-the-Lens Club' started by jmg, Mar 16, 2007.

  1. jmg

    jmg UCantFixStupid

    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Location:
    swimming in Carls pool
    Hey, all--I'm getting a D200 next week. Any opinions on Tamron's 17-55 f2.8?
     
  2. krinkov

    krinkov Shutter Maniac

    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Location:
    In-country
    DON'T! Bear in mind that no matter how good a DSLR you'll get, it's practically worthless if you use an aftermarket lens. In my 30-year experience, having handled a multitude of cameras and lenses, I have never seen an aftermarket lens that's even close to being "good enough". Often, the most attractive thing about an aftermarket lens is its price but in the long run, these lenses tend to fog-out faster and fail to activate certain camera functions like multi-segment metering and focusing so what you save on cost, you pay for dearly in image quality and reliability. You can get consumer type dedicated lenses at the same cost but they will always be sharper and perform better with your camera than an aftermarket lens that costs half the price.
     

  3. hwyhobo

    hwyhobo

    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2003
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    For the purpose of this post, I will assume that you are actually referring to the Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD. If you read opinions on dpreview.com and fredmiranda.com, you will find that many consider that lens to be quite excellent IF you get a good copy.

    Check it here:

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=308&sort=7&cat=43&page=1
     
  4. ponykilr

    ponykilr Off The Porch

    Messages:
    670
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Location:
    Smithfield NC
    +1
     
  5. jmg

    jmg UCantFixStupid

    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Location:
    swimming in Carls pool
    oops.. too late.

    Bought the D200, the Tamron, and the MB-200 on Monday--went out of town with it wed. I'll get a CF reader next week and post pics from it.

    I haven't tried it with my Nikon 28-80 or ikon 70-300 G lenses, or my Tamron 28-105 f2.8 yet. As far as the D200 itself?

    :hearts:

    man, what a nice rig!

    I'll probably pick up a 50mm f1.8 later in the summer, after my credit card cools off some ;)
     
  6. Laramie In MT

    Laramie In MT

    Messages:
    1,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    MT
    I'm using Canon, so just talking out my @$$ here, but all the reviews i've read of the Canon mount Tammy 17-50 2.8 says it's sharper than the Sigma equivalent and for the money, it's a REALLY nice kit lens/walk-around lens replacement. YMMV w/ Nikon stuff though. Congrats on the new rig though!