close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

State police identify weapons used in sandy hook investigation

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by RussP, Jan 19, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HollowHead

    HollowHead Firm member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    24,949
    Likes Received:
    2,932
    Location:
    Where the buffalo roam
    It was in the car, just earlier. HH
     
  2. RMTactical

    RMTactical Battle Born CLM

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    12,610
    Likes Received:
    29
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    How stupid is the person that wrote up that "clarification"?
     

  3. Shinytop

    Shinytop

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    272
    My unit in Vietnam had M14's and then M16's were issued. I know because I helped inventory the new weapons serial number by serial number. They were issued with 20 round magazines although 30 round magazines became common by the time I went on my second tour.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
  4. eyelikeglasses

    eyelikeglasses Hooah, Hooah.

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    :wavey:
    Truth vs. Falsehood. Opinion vs. Fact.:whistling:
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
  5. HollowHead

    HollowHead Firm member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    24,949
    Likes Received:
    2,932
    Location:
    Where the buffalo roam
    What powers the vehicles built by the Ford Motor Company, Inc.? HH
     
  6. eyelikeglasses

    eyelikeglasses Hooah, Hooah.

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    What was in your head before it became hollow?

    Propaganda by any other name is still..... wait for it......wait for it..... wait..... Propaganda!!:wow:
     
  7. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    10,280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Tejas
    Ain't that the truth, as if the terminology of clip or magazine will make a ounce of difference in this upcoming public debate on a possible new AWB. :upeyes:
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
  8. eyelikeglasses

    eyelikeglasses Hooah, Hooah.

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    The opposition is using every trick to coerce public opinion.

    Try to be familiar with your enemies' tactics. Including... wait for it.... the good old divide and conquer.

    Here endeth the lesson.:rofl:
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
  9. HollowHead

    HollowHead Firm member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    24,949
    Likes Received:
    2,932
    Location:
    Where the buffalo roam
    Very well said. HH
     
  10. eyelikeglasses

    eyelikeglasses Hooah, Hooah.

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    Thank you.:wavey:
     
  11. HollowHead

    HollowHead Firm member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    24,949
    Likes Received:
    2,932
    Location:
    Where the buffalo roam
    I was quoting Ruggles. Your post was idiotic. HH
     
  12. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    10,280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Tejas
    ?:dunno:

    How is this trying to divide and conquer? It a interchangeable term pure and simple that has no bearing on the upcoming public debate.

    The term "assault rifle" vs "modern sporting rifle" could be said to have leverage in the debate. Even maybe "high capacity" vs "standard capacity" in reference to a magazine could.

    But 30 round "magazine" vs 30 round "clip" means nothing in the debate.
     
  13. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    45,879
    Likes Received:
    15,671
    Location:
    Kentucky
    [​IMG]
     
  14. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    45,879
    Likes Received:
    15,671
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Here's a hint - the surest way to tell you are no longer a gun newb, is that when somebody calls a magazine a "clip" you won't even be tempted to correct them - the "ha ha you said 'clip'" thing is the surest mark of the newb who has learned a little and is eager to show it off.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
  15. RussP

    RussP Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    34,631
    Likes Received:
    5,147
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Interesting theory...:cool:
     
  16. DanaT

    DanaT Pharaoh

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    25,750
    Likes Received:
    3,625
    Location:
    CO & Baden –Württemberg
    So let me understand this??

    "We" are up in arms because "clip" and "magazine" are being used interchangeably, but not upset that "assault rifle" is being used incorrectly.

    And assault rifle is a select fire weapon which allows automatic firing and an intermediate cartridge. It occupies the position between a submachine gun and a light machine gun (i.e M249) and/or battle rifle (i.e. FN-FAL / G3).

    We have alread lost the fight because clip and magazine are both "neutral" and we are letting them bog us down in this definition squabble and allowing them to re-define assault rifle.
     
  17. RussP

    RussP Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    34,631
    Likes Received:
    5,147
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Yes, but still the definition of an assault rifle, well, here from another thread...
    :cool:
     
  18. M&P15T

    M&P15T Beard One

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    23,397
    Likes Received:
    5,610
    Location:
    Arlington, VA.
    Or....it's someone that is interested in using correct terminology. Just because incorrect term useage becomes somewhat of a norm, does't make it the correct useage, doesn't stop it from being incorrect. And just because someone corrects others when they use incorrect terminology, doesn't make them a noob.

    Anywhoo....that press release is pure politically correct garbage, tailored for the gun-grabbers. It's the continuing effort to demonize standard capacity magazines as something they're not.

    That is reason enough to continue to correct people when they use incorrect terms like "high-capacity assault clip". It's stopping the deominatization of inanimate ojects for political gain through the deliberate use of incorrect terminology.

    There are people that work on the hill that write speeches and press-releases, that are educated in psychology and sociology. Their entire goal is to use terms and words in manners that evoke strong emotional reactions. They do not care if those terms and words are used correctly, they only care about the emotional reaction they create. And this tactic works. It works damn well.

    So, we now have incorrect terms like "high-capacity assault clips". And we sit here arguing whether or not we should bother correcting people when they use those terms.

    Of course we should.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
  19. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    45,879
    Likes Received:
    15,671
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Also, when you post about how newbs are the only people who really care about the "clip vs magazine" debate, it upsets the newbs, who feel compelled to explain why they are right.:upeyes:
     
  20. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003
    Messages:
    28,685
    Likes Received:
    17

    I find it odd that a press release from a police dept which is at the center of a massacre of K-1 grade aged children in a school setting, in what is one of the "wealthiest" states in the nation, in what is THE MOST VISIBLE shooting in the USA for the past 10 years, in what is probably the most pivotal and divisive shooting as it applies to gun rights (or as the left would like to happen - GUN ERADICATION/GUN CONTROL)

    that such a report, known in advance will be microscopically dissected, analyzed, regurgitated and rehashed...

    that such a report includes slanted language as it applies to gun terminology. I am not a cop, but I am in a field where I may be called upon to testify for my actions, or for those who report to me, and in my learnings to best prepare for this, we are taught to chose conciseness and accuracy in our prose.

    Yes, the report is directly from the PD involved. It is a shame to see that no one in the chain of command that read that report chose to correct inaccuracies in the vernacular.

    Do I smell a conspiracy? No. Do I see sloppiness? Yes.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.