[kyjd75]

Hope its not true.

Here is another discussion about P365 barrel problems with lot of photos: http://sigtalk.com/p250-p320-p365-p320-x-5-pistols/270746-p365-range-report-good-bad-ugly.html To me very disappointing, as I had planned to buy one of these soon. Now it is definitely a wait and see what happens situation.

 

[kyjd75]

I don't believe this. I belong to Sig forums too and there has been no mention or discussion about any problems with the P365. I called Sig Sauer inquiring why none of my resources have any in stock. The answer? "They're shipping."
So far this has only been on our Glock Talk forum.
Someone has done a good (outstanding) job of making these links appear to be from Sig Sauer.
Until I see something more definitive___I will consider this a "Troll".
Stay safe.
Poli Viejo

From Sig Talk: http://sigtalk.com/p250-p320-p365-p320-x-5-pistols/271490-sig-tweaking-p365-design.html

From Sigforum: http://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/430601935/m/2790044534/p/21

 

[kyjd75]

More discussion on Sig Talk about the 365 barrel/slide peening. Sounds like it is happening to a lot of them: http://sigtalk.com/p250-p320-p365-p320-x-5-pistols/270730-p365-barrel-slide-peening.html

 

[kyjd75]

I started this thread, and not really because I wanted to bash Sig. I like Sig, and would like to purchase a P365. But, I want it to be a reliable firearm before I buy it. Irregardless of Glock's problems, it seems to me that the P365 does have some problems at the moment. I hope they get them straightened out. If they do, I will be buying one down the road.

 

[kyjd75]

I agree with bac1023. I always considered the Sig P226 the ultimate high quality firearm. Now it seems not to be so.

 

[kyjd75]

In fact, I would love to have a set of 226, 227 and 229 Sigs, but I'm afraid to make that investment right now considering all the problems Sig is having concerning QC.