Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Ruger Ruger Single Six in 32

Discussion in 'Ruger Club' started by Wet Dog, Sep 26, 2011.

  1. Wet Dog

    Wet Dog

    Likes Received:
    Jan 8, 2005
    the Evergreen State
    I'm a HUGE fan of the Ruger Single Six. It has been one of my most carried firearms in the field and I've shot more critters with it than any other firearm I own. It has always been a reliable and accurate firearm and it just plain gets the job done - from paper targets and plinking to camp meat, I have nothing but praise for it.


    A while back I passed on a Single Six in 32 Mag and ever since then it has been like a splinter in my mind. Well I remedied that recently and I am now in possession of one.

    Among the first things I noticed is the 32 Mag hefts more lightly than the 22 caliber version.


    The 32 Mag weighs in at 30.7 ounces (empty) vs. the 22lr 5.5" version at 38.4 oz. Almost a half pound lighter... Not huge but noticeably lighter and it seems to be in a good way as sometimes lighter weight punishes the shooter with recoil, reduced size or lack of stability. The 32 Mag Ruger feels just right.

    Since this was my first venture into the realm of the 32 H&R Mag I had to buy dies, brass (Starline) and I also purchased the RCBS 32-98 SWC mold based on its near universal praise and accuracy with the Ruger Single Six. Officially the OAL for this caliber is 1.350" but the 1.400" + OAL of the cartridges I cast, loaded and had ready to go fit the Single Six with room to spare.

    My early tests show promise. I've only tried Alliant Unique, Winchester 231, Bullseye & Lil'Gun powders so far, since data on this cartridge is somewhat limited at this time. Even so I was very pleased with my early experiments.

    The powder that seems to be most consistent over the chronograph is Winchester 231. It has also produced the most impressive groups.

    7 yards, offhand (no rests) with both the Lyman 311008 (.313" actual) and the RCBS 32-98-SWC (sized .314").

    The two bullets I've tested are the Lyman 311008 (118 grains as cast) and the RCBS 32-98-SWC (103 grains as cast). Using a roughly 20/1 alloy the 008 drops right at .313" from the mold and I loaded them as cast. The RCBS 98 grain bullet dropped .316" and in VERY limited testing seemed to shoot (slightly) better when sized to .314 in my Lee push through sizer (pan lubed).


    Lyman 311008 bullet in Starline Case.

    Here are my first findings.

    RCBS 32-98-SWC

    -Unsized (.316") over Unique (Starting load) 1144 fps avg. Promising accuracy - still getting used to the sights and trigger of this new to me revolver. Wide extreme spread, over 150 fps in the 5 shot string.

    -Same load as above with a .314" sized bullet, slightly better 7 yard group and second best extreme spread/standard of deviation of the session. Slightly improved accuracy vs above loading, not conclusive though. 1110 fps average.

    -With MAX published load of Unique this bullet has produced the best groups the velocity is much more consistent than with the starting load. Velocity averages just under 1200 fps. It does not produce the fireball that Lil'Gun loads produced at the same velocity.

    -Winchester 231 at starting load levels produced 928 fps avg and also excellent accuracy.

    Lyman 311008 cast bullet (118 grains) as cast, pan lubed.

    -starting load levels of Unique averaged. 980 fps Accuracy was on par with the day's average comparatively, good.

    -Using Oregon Trail's reloading data for a 115 cast bullet and just a shade under Max for Unique the velocity averaged just under 1200 fps.

    -Winchester 231 starting load level produced 920 fps average with this bullet and one of the best groups of the day.

    Double Check ALL LOAD DATA![/b]

    The Lee Factory Crimp Die was used for all loads.

    Overall, I really couldn't be much happier. This little revolver shows some real accuracy promise and will no doubt see field use as a camp meat, woods loafing, plinker, pack gun and probably get some use in silhouette matches as well. My only regret is that it took me too long to get one.
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2011
  2. bac1023


    Likes Received:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Very nice :)

    Thanks for the info.

  3. Gappy


    Likes Received:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Interesting, thanks!