close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Ribbit

Discussion in 'Through-the-Lens Club' started by MrsKitty, Jun 20, 2006.

  1. MrsKitty

    MrsKitty

    Messages:
    18,802
    Likes Received:
    31
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Location:
    >^..^<
    These were taken in deep shade almost in the dark. I was wondering if I could have gotten him without such a low f/stop? DOF is more shallow than I would like on the head on shot...

    When I tried going higher, I kept blowing and he was getting impatient. Rather than loose him completely, I just opened up. I loathe tripods so I can't use a slow enough speed I can't handhold. I prefer no flash (plus I knew it would startle him more than I already had). Suggestions?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Camera model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
    Date/Time: 2006:06:15 20:02:57
    Resolution: 800 x 533
    Flash used: No
    Focal length: 190.0mm (35mm equivalent: 1331mm)
    CCD width: 5.14mm
    Exposure time: 0.0100 s (1/100)
    Aperture: f/5.6
    ISO equiv.: 200
    Whitebalance: Auto
    Metering Mode: matrix
    Exposure: Manual
    Exposure Mode: Auto bracketing
     
  2. MrsKitty

    MrsKitty

    Messages:
    18,802
    Likes Received:
    31
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Location:
    >^..^<
    Forgot to say, no PP other than conversion to jpeg from RAW and to resize for posting.
     

  3. hwyhobo

    hwyhobo

    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2003
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    Just a comment here, but 190mm on XT is equivalent to @300mm on 35mm. BTW, with 300mm you need more than f5.6 to get the whole frog into focus. Solutions - either tripod or raise ISO to 800 (I know, it may affect the quality).

    Still, I am not sure if I find anything wrong with the first shot. I kinda like the focus-on-the-eyes look.
     
  4. MrsKitty

    MrsKitty

    Messages:
    18,802
    Likes Received:
    31
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Location:
    >^..^<
    Raising ISO is simple enough :supergrin:

    Thanks!
     
  5. hwyhobo

    hwyhobo

    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2003
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    I know, but that's cheating ;). Tripod would serve you better. Not only would it allow you to increase the f value, but would prevent any unwanted camera motion. I have an idea, when you sell that picture you mentioned in another thread, get a nice tripod and a carrying case. :supergrin:
     
  6. MrsKitty

    MrsKitty

    Messages:
    18,802
    Likes Received:
    31
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Location:
    >^..^<
    I have a tripod that was a gift. It stays in my car all the time, you know, just in case I happen to get somewhere and need it :supergrin: