close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Rhode Island: Providence Passes Resolution Banning Semi-Automatic Guns

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by Fox, Jan 12, 2013.

  1. Fox

    Fox Varmit Control

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,721
    Likes Received:
    278
    Location:
    USA
    On Thursday night, the Providence City Council passed a resolution banning all semi-automatic firearms in the city. This resolution passed with 8 votes, 6 opposed and 1 abstention. This sweeping gun ban proclamation is an all-out assault on the Second Amendment rights of Rhode Islanders.

    Last session at the Statehouse, the NRA-ILA worked to defeat legislation that attacked the state firearms preemption statute. Rhode Island has a firearms preemption law that prohibits local governments from adopting gun control laws which are more restrictive than state law. Firearms preemption statutes are designed to prevent a patchwork of confusing, and sometimes conflicting, laws as residents travel from city to city.

    In 2012, Senate Bill 2573 by Senator Harold Metts (D-6), now-former Senator Rhoda Perry (D-3), Senator Juan Pichardo (D-2), Senator Paul Jabour (D-5) and Senator Elizabeth Crowley (D-16) would have given control to regulate firearms and ammunition to local jurisdictions, and it would have included ownership, possession, transportation, carrying, transfer, sale, purchase delay, licensing, registration and taxation. That dangerous legislation was defeated in a Senate committee, but it will be re-introduced again THIS SESSION.

    The Rhode Island General Assembly convened for its 2013 session this week. The NRA-ILA is working to defeat any attacks on firearms preemption prohibiting anti-gun municipalities from enacting gun bans like the one Providence has just adopted. Anti-gun forces are moving quickly and your immediate action on this matter is urgently needed. Gun owners should contact their state Senator and Representative IMMEDIATELY and respectfully urge lawmakers to oppose these harmful bans which target law-abiding citizens and do nothing to improve public safety or target criminals.

    MORE
     
  2. elsolo

    elsolo

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2003
    Messages:
    6,502
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Location:
    socal
    Sounds like the city passed a law that the courts will toss out.
     

  3. PocketProtector

    PocketProtector

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    PhillyBurbs
    Add it to the list of places I will NEVER visit or spend my money again.
     
  4. frank4570

    frank4570

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,508
    Likes Received:
    8
    It's hard to believe they can get away with this.
     
  5. tarpleyg

    tarpleyg

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2002
    Messages:
    3,153
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    So now, not only have they broken state law, they have also snubbed their noses at the US constitution. What a bunch of idiots.
     
  6. G36's Rule

    G36's Rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2001
    Messages:
    9,373
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    Spring, TX.
    Article was pretty clear, they can't get away with this. Preemption will not allow it.
     
  7. Fox

    Fox Varmit Control

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,721
    Likes Received:
    278
    Location:
    USA
    They break the laws that they expect others to obey. The question is why do they get away with it?
     
  8. Little Joe

    Little Joe

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,146
    Likes Received:
    1,938
    Location:
    At The Ready
    Would it be wrong to say I hope they all get mugged and their homes invaded before the month is out, for those who voted for it?
     
  9. scrider

    scrider

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    So this new law suggests that anybody that legally possessed a semi-automatic firearm in Providence is now breaking the law?
     
  10. frank4570

    frank4570

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,508
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yes, it would be wrong. But that doesn't mean you can't say it.

    After all, they've already shown it is ok to do things that are clearly wrong.
     
  11. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003
    Messages:
    28,685
    Likes Received:
    17
    No, you would not be wrong. People who swear to support and uphold the constitution, but diametrically oppose significant components of it deserve to be tarred, feathered, shot, decapitated and burnt.

    And then severely punished.

    If you don't plan on supporting the constitution don't run for office - it should be that simple.
     
  12. JohnBT

    JohnBT NRA Benefactor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2000
    Messages:
    5,660
    Likes Received:
    522
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    They didn't pass a law, they passed a resolution. Big difference.
     
  13. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003
    Messages:
    28,685
    Likes Received:
    17

    Ok, I will take the feathering off the table, that was a bit harsh. :embarassed: :rofl:
     
  14. GAFinch

    GAFinch

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,939
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Georgia
    I've seen a couple Democrat strategists on Fox News suggest banning all semi-automatic firearms as well. Despite any assurances otherwise, this is what they all really want.
     
  15. Michael Rye

    Michael Rye

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    153
    Location:
    SC
    Yes, they are all going to be so much safer now:rollingeyes:

    Total friggin' idiots deserve whatever happens to them.
     
  16. RGbiker

    RGbiker

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Arizona
    Ooooooh, the local Gangbangers are gonna' be pissed...:supergrin:
     
  17. VA27

    VA27

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2002
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    138
    Location:
    usa
    There, fixed it for you.:D If all the gun owners in R.I. left the state there wouldn't be enough people left have a football game.
     
  18. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    22,486
    Likes Received:
    4,128
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    There is also a bill to eliminate preemption and give local jurisdictions the ability to regulate firearms and ammo.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  19. jame

    jame I don't even know....what I'm doing here....

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2002
    Messages:
    6,357
    Likes Received:
    2,546
    Location:
    Central Iowa
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  20. .45Super-Man

    .45Super-Man

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,609
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Smallville
    Our founders would have fixed this with a simple platform and about 6 ft of rope. "Shall not infringe" doesn't have a 'grey area'. You either uphold the constitution or you're an enemy of it and a traitor.