close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Remember, when someone says...

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by railfancwb, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. railfancwb

    railfancwb

    Messages:
    9,691
    Likes Received:
    4,339
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
  2. jeanderson

    jeanderson Making America great again! Platinum Member

    Messages:
    8,962
    Likes Received:
    13,254
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Location:
    Ohio
    I'm not getting the "it's not about money" angle here. The Supreme Court decision on DOMA is about discrimination. To me, the advocates for the "Respect for Marriage" act are trying to usurp the rights of states to define marriage.
     

  3. Kablam

    Kablam

    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    So the striking down of DOMA didn't remedy discrimination against gay married couples as neatly as I was told in another thread here. Now we need a "respect for marriage act" to fix it. So, MORE legislation is needed because we don't want to fix the more basic problem of giving benefits to the "married class" that the "unmarried class" is denied. This is just one example how the gov dividing society along arbitrary lines and deciding which group deserves special treatment is a bad idea. And, of course, it is at least in part about the money.
     
  4. FLIPPER 348

    FLIPPER 348 Bigfoot enthusiast enthusiast

    Messages:
    25,491
    Likes Received:
    7,037
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Location:
    Bend Oregon

    exactly

    ....why else would all the homos want to be 'married'??
     
  5. railfancwb

    railfancwb

    Messages:
    9,691
    Likes Received:
    4,339
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
  6. ArtificialGrape

    ArtificialGrape CLM

    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    I'm sure if the 1136 benefits afforded to married couples suddenly went away there would be no public outcry from the heterosexuals, because for heterosexuals it's not about money.
     
  7. ChuteTheMall

    ChuteTheMall Wallbuilder and Weapon Bearer

    Messages:
    70,987
    Likes Received:
    102,061
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Location:
    Colluder in Cahoots
    Why does the government give special rights, privileges and tax breaks to married couples, while denying them to single people?

    Is this a legitimate and necessary purpose of government?
     
  8. ArtificialGrape

    ArtificialGrape CLM

    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    I guess you'd have to ask the 84% married Congress :dunno:
     
  9. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Cosmopolitan Bias

    Messages:
    62,281
    Likes Received:
    15,893
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    No...

    The government shouldn't even know if you are married


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2013
  10. Kablam

    Kablam

    Messages:
    3,741
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Ding ding!

    Thank you. Someone besides me finally said it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2013