close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Remember, when someone says...

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by railfancwb, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. railfancwb

    railfancwb

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    7,755
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
  2. jeanderson

    jeanderson Making America great again! Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Messages:
    7,442
    Likes Received:
    8,036
    Location:
    Ohio
    I'm not getting the "it's not about money" angle here. The Supreme Court decision on DOMA is about discrimination. To me, the advocates for the "Respect for Marriage" act are trying to usurp the rights of states to define marriage.
     

  3. Kablam

    Kablam

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,601
    Likes Received:
    646
    So the striking down of DOMA didn't remedy discrimination against gay married couples as neatly as I was told in another thread here. Now we need a "respect for marriage act" to fix it. So, MORE legislation is needed because we don't want to fix the more basic problem of giving benefits to the "married class" that the "unmarried class" is denied. This is just one example how the gov dividing society along arbitrary lines and deciding which group deserves special treatment is a bad idea. And, of course, it is at least in part about the money.
     
  4. FLIPPER 348

    FLIPPER 348 Happy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    24,698
    Likes Received:
    5,721
    Location:
    Bend Oregon

    exactly

    ....why else would all the homos want to be 'married'??
     
  5. railfancwb

    railfancwb

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    7,755
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
  6. ArtificialGrape

    ArtificialGrape CLM

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    I'm sure if the 1136 benefits afforded to married couples suddenly went away there would be no public outcry from the heterosexuals, because for heterosexuals it's not about money.
     
  7. ChuteTheMall

    ChuteTheMall Witless Protection Program

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    65,341
    Likes Received:
    83,820
    Location:
    Trump Tower, overlooking the wall Mexico bought.
    Why does the government give special rights, privileges and tax breaks to married couples, while denying them to single people?

    Is this a legitimate and necessary purpose of government?
     
  8. ArtificialGrape

    ArtificialGrape CLM

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    I guess you'd have to ask the 84% married Congress :dunno:
     
  9. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    58,224
    Likes Received:
    10,823
    No...

    The government shouldn't even know if you are married


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2013
  10. Kablam

    Kablam

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,601
    Likes Received:
    646
    Ding ding!

    Thank you. Someone besides me finally said it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2013