close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

PFDs vs. Traditional "T" for New Students??

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by C150J, Dec 14, 2003.

  1. C150J

    C150J Crackberry

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1999
    Location:
    USA
    Hey guys,

    With the advent of affordable PFDs (like the new Garmin GNS 1000) and their presence in GA aircraft (the FAA's new "Technically Advanced Aircraft" term), do you think students should be learning on them, or on "steam"? Personally, I think new pilots should be trained on a traditional "T" panel initially, as it seems to me that most PFD/MFDs are designed for more experienced pilots. To me, they SEEM to be more of a "snapshot" of what's going on, not a "full briefing." For example, an airspeed "tape" is a lot different than a fully-arced gauge, as it really expects the pilot to have a general idea of what ref speeds are. What do y'all think? What about learning on FADEC versus a three-levered (throttle, mixture, prop) quadrant?



    Justin
     
  2. flybywire

    flybywire

    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Location:
    Memphis
    You gotta learn the fundamentals. Start at the bottom and work your way up. The stuff at the top doesn't always work. (Almost always works though.)
     

  3. BillCola

    BillCola Supreme Cmdr ®

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2000
    Location:
    Utopia
    I agree with both of you, BUT...in 20 years or less, they'll all be PFD's anyway, don't ya think? Then, it will be moot.

    On the other hand, learning on a PFD now would leave a person with a whole lot of unfamiliar aircraft left to learn.
     
  4. Medpilot 2

    Medpilot 2 Smkumifyagotum

    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Are you talking about the G1000?

    [​IMG]

    I think it depends on what type of equipment is going to be flown later on. Why learn the antiquated stuff if it's never going to be put to practical use?
     
  5. rwg_bt

    rwg_bt

    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Heh, even the backup horizon is glass.
     
  6. glocknsail

    glocknsail

    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Location:
    non-Maine
    After flying glass, you will have no scan.
     
  7. Superfueler

    Superfueler Glockenplane

    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    I'm not sure how you define affordable, but I know I won't be buying one anytime soon, and neither will the flying club I am in. While we will see alot more glass in GA planes in the near future, there will still be plenty of 'normal' cockpits out there. I think the basic training should focus on the T config, and then if a student transitions to a glass cockpit aircraft, train them to use that setup.