Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by HerrGlock, Apr 27, 2013.
Funny how the liberal blowhard wasn't able to articulate exactly what purpose the 2nd Amendment serves, or why the Founding Fathers bothered to include it at all.
Also funny how he completely ignores all the ancillary source material. I'm pretty sure Federalist #46 has something to say about this.
If it's not to be able to take back control from a government outta control.....what is it for?
Duck hunting and target shooting, silly.
.... It's the 'Fudd' amendment .... They were big, politically, back then ....
(Liberals seem never to be even embarrassed about saying patently stupid things .... ) ...
What a moron. A revolution every 2-6 yrs. lol
I think he forgets his history - that when GW (The OG one) stepped down, the country was in shock. They expected him to serve for life. . . Like a king. Dub, the first, understood that government was a fragile thing. And despite this wickit-Pissah constitution, people were still needed to ensure despotism didn't return.