close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Obama talks guns, Democratic leaders duck

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Bren, Jul 30, 2012.

  1. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    45,879
    Likes Received:
    15,675
    Location:
    Kentucky
    http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/26/politics/obama-guns-congress/index.html?hpt=hp_bn3

    Interesting. The president apparently said: "I believe the majority of gun owners would agree ... that we should check someone's criminal record before they can check out a gun seller; that a mentally unbalanced individual should not be able to get his hands on a gun so easily."

    Is he proposing something like an Illinois FOID card? Since we already do a NICS check, I'm not sure I can figure out what a pre-NICS check would acccomplish. However, post-election, if he wins, this will amount to national FOID's (remember what state hee's from), NICS for all gun sales (or requiring the FOID for all private sales), and a lot more.

    Obama is trying to walk the line of letting the anti-gunners know he's going to do something, without creating the massive anti-gun backlash that is likely. The good news is, if Obama fails to walk that line carefully, James Holmes may actually keep him from being reelected.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2012
  2. svtpwnz

    svtpwnz

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    3,060
    Likes Received:
    1,838
    Location:
    SC
    I have very little doubt that if reelected, Obama will in fact impose some sort of national FOID BS or maybe worse. However, the closer it gets to November the more I see the Dems loosing big in both houses and the presidency.
     

  3. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is my guess, the "gunshow" "loophole".
     
  4. JBnTX

    JBnTX 2 Timothy 2:15

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,973
    Likes Received:
    7,067
    Location:
    Must Be Texas
    "...that a mentally unbalanced individual should not be able to get his hands on a gun so easily," said the president."


    As usual Obama is just flapping his gums and not making any sense.

    How would any kind of check determine if a person is "mentally unbalanced"?

    Aren't medical records protected by the doctor/patient confidentiality?

    Unless a person had a prior criminal record, his mental illness would most likely never be detected by any check.

    Mental illness is a broad sweeping term that covers a large amount of medical conditions, not all of which would preclude gun ownership.

    I'd rather not take a sanity test before I purchase my next firearm.

    ..
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2012
  5. jeanderson

    jeanderson Making America great again! Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Messages:
    7,493
    Likes Received:
    8,216
    Location:
    Ohio
    If a person is under treatment by a psychiatrist and that person makes specific threats, the psychiatrist has an obligation to report that to authorities. But only if the threat is against a specific person or group.

    Of course, if there's a wacko who is not under treatment, there is no way for the system to prevent that person from getting guns and going bezerk. It sure would be interesting to know what James Holmes said to his shrink.
     
  6. JFrame

    JFrame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    41,309
    Likes Received:
    12,847
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic, US of A
    Any time a progressive leftist uses a term like "common sense," my warning lights come on -- because they have repeatedly demonstrated they have none.


    .