Joined
·
8,769 Posts
Dbl tap make a good anti bear round called Bear Tooth.
Where is that listed?Dbl tap make a good anti bear round called Bear Tooth.
I set up a 500 round G20/200gr WFN test, handloaded/Double Tap ammo (Lonewolf, KKM/6" barrel) and experienced two failure to feed issues w/i 350 rounds (one each handloaded/DT), the G20 has been in a safe ever since.If your Glock 20 will stabilize it and shoot it reliably. It might not, and you may need to try 200 grain instead. Buffalo Bore also makes a 220 HC, but it’s not coated. That’s what I used in my 20 for years in Alaska and it was very reliable, but I also had a KKM barrel in the gun.
Basically, if it were me and I had to bet my life on it, 100 rounds minimum without a malf, in the mags I’d be carrying in the bush, before I’d consider it.
Underwood certainly is a popular choice but whether its the "very best" is debated. The other option I see a lot of people recommend is Buffalo Bore's equivalent. An Outdoor Life article you can google likes that better. Its what I went with, but partly thats because it was available locally since Buffalo Bore is made a lot close to where I live. I don't think can go wrong either way.View attachment 1154642
Please correct me if I’m wrong but from my research and video test observations this 220 grain coated hard-cast is the very best ammo for Grizzly defense you can get to use in a Glock G20.
I know the Underwood muzzle energy is 694 foot lbs for their 200 grains at 1250 FPS and the 220 grain is 704 foot lbs at 1200 FPS. It sounds like the 220 would have better penetration and recent testing has showed it consistent with advertised power or even better.FWIW, most high-end 10mm ammo manufacturers list their 200 grain HC loads as having greater energy than their 220 gr.
I personally have seen better performance with the 200's and don't use the 220's at all.
And Double Tap's 200 gr cast load is 1300 fps @ 750 ft lbs M.E.I know the Underwood muzzle energy is 694 foot lbs for their 200 grains at 1250 FPS and the 220 grain is 704 foot lbs at 1200 FPS. It sounds like the 220 would have better penetration and recent testing has showed it consistent with advertised power or even better.
Good find!And Double Tap's 200 gr cast load is 1300 fps @ 750 ft lbs M.E.
![]()
10mm 200gr Hardcast Solid™ WFNGC
One of the BEST handgun hunting/ woods defense loads to date! Featuring a 21 brinell 200gr Hardcast Solid bullet (Wide Flat Nose Gas Check) that we cast in house, you will not find this kind of performance anywhere else. This load is what you choose when deep, deep, penetration is what you...doubletapammo.com
And it works quite well. It is one of very few store-bought loads I have ever used in my 10mm's.The profile of the 200gr WFNGC that Double Tap uses is way better than what Underwood offers, much bigger meplat.
The profile of the 200gr WFNGC that Double Tap uses is way better than what Underwood offers, much bigger meplat.
The penetration diff would be minimal if any. I prefer my own 200gr wnfp because of the wider meplat. If buying factory, i would try both 200 & 220 See which shoots best & most reliable. Shoot them strong & weak hand only, thats where malfs occur most.I know the Underwood muzzle energy is 694 foot lbs for their 200 grains at 1250 FPS and the 220 grain is 704 foot lbs at 1200 FPS. It sounds like the 220 would have better penetration and recent testing has showed it consistent with advertised power or even better.
Most ammo manf dont make vel claims, pretty normal.But can it be trusted?
That’s something I think Underwood strives to do better at.I have never had Double Tap come anywhere near even 100fps of their advertised velocity, always low, and this is going back over 15 years!