Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Ruble Noon, Dec 7, 2012.
Who doesn't want to be free?
Genetic mutation is very laughable though.
Have you spent much time perusing GTPI?
Submissiveness is very common.
There is a difference between a liberal and a libertarian.'08.
I doubt it's genetic, but I suspect that it (or rather the lack of it) does have some very real roots in brain function and formation that are established at a young age. There was almost certainly a similar phenomenon back when slavery was taken for granted as a "righteous institution." You just need to expose a child to violence early and often, and get them to identify with the attacker rather than the victim, and boom -- you've made a little authoritarian who has a custom-built sociopathy towards whatever class of innocent people he saw abused. Today, this is what the state does in 12 years of "public education" -- extol violent state intervention in nearly all circumstances, and denigrate innocent people who don't want to be a part of it.
It may be that only a tiny fraction of people have what it takes to break out of that kind of conditioning, though.
Y linked dominant, or recessive?
The way the country is going, I'm thinking recessive makes more sense.
As usual, Chronos nails it.
I think there is a further step that you stopped short of.
It even seems horrifying to some "libertarians" but, at one time, in this Country a male child was taught to stand up for himself if he was picked on. He didn't "run and tell the teacher" he generally got in a fight. (oh the horror). Once you teach a child to be dependent on authority figures...well you see where it goes. They no longer make their own decisions, they become used to abiding by what the authority figure says and they are more willing to follow orders "handed down".
We home school ta avoid the mandated indoctrination.'08.
In theory libertarianism sounds great, but in reality it's impossible to practice simply because we must have laws if we are to remain a civilized society.
Libertarianism has been hijacked by two different groups that have their own selfish motives.
One is the anarchist who feels he should be allowed to live his life as he sees fit. It's his life and what he does with it is nobody's business.
The other is the pothead whose only motivation in life is legal pot. He'll support any politician who promises to legalize marijuana.
Without the support of these two groups, libertarians would have become extinct long ago.
There are a lot of good ideas in libertarianism. Most of them in fact. The problem is that absolute liberty is anarchy, and a system of might is right.
I'm no where near an anarchist, but we could definitely take many large leaps toward libertarianism and things would be better.
It requires a balance.
Most people don't want other people to be free.
What's the problem with that? The initiation of for is wrong. You should be allowed to live your life as you want as long as you don't harm someone else.
Wanna see something funny,my kid competes against public school kids.Their parents walk away quite angry.'08.
That concept is a social myth, spread by people who think only of themselves.
The problem is that no one lives their life in a vacuum, and many times what you do does harm someone else.
Even if you only harm yourself, it affects others indirectly.
Whatever harmed you also has the potential to harm others, who may not wish to be harmed in that manner.
That behavior needs to be regulated to protect others.
Governments and laws are necessary if we want to live in a safe, secure and civilized society.
Always the consummate statist.
Only so long as its other people's choices being restricted. It's all good until you start talking about something he wants to do.