Is being sprayed with mace considered a deadlly threat?

Discussion in 'Tactics and Training' started by Wash-ar15, Feb 11, 2010.

  1. Wash-ar15

    Wash-ar15

    Messages:
    1,664
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Been reading that some folks are using mace or pepper spray to precipitate an attack. If you are sprayed in an unprovoked attack,would this be considered an deadly force attack?
     
  2. Glock30 Guy

    Glock30 Guy XD40

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Location:
    SC
    I carry mace for situations when deadly force is not justified but I need a way out from a potentially bad situation. I do not consider it deadly force. I'd only use it if provoked however.
     

  3. KaosV

    KaosV

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    Washington
    You should have a friend spray you in the face/eyes with mace/pepper stray then have him physically attack you and see how you do.

    Another thing you could do is get an a couple airsoft guns. He sprays you then you try to engage him with your gun before he shots you.

    Tells us how it goes...
     
  4. Captain Caveman

    Captain Caveman a.k.a. DaReaper

    Messages:
    1,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2003
    Location:
    Colorado
    Absolutely yes. If you get sprayed you are incapacitated and your weapon is at risk of being taken.
     
  5. AggiePhil

    AggiePhil ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Location:
    Texas
    This is not an easy question to answer and the situation would dictate a lot of things. A lot of factors come into play. A uniformed police officer with a gun in plain view on his hip being sprayed in the face is a lot different from a regular citizen with a concealed handgun being sprayed. I would think that it would be a lot easier for the police officer to argue why he had to shoot the person who sprayed and then fought with him (saying that he was concerned about his gun being taken away, since it was clearly visible and everyone would have expected him, a uniformed officer to be armed) than it would for an ordinary citizen carrying concealed to argue why he up and shot someone who sprayed him. Then again, like I said, every situation is different and the concern about having your gun taken away (concealed or not) is certainly a valid one. So...a hard question to answer, IMO. FWIW, I carry spray, both on duty and off.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2010
  6. Glock30 Guy

    Glock30 Guy XD40

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Location:
    SC
    Under the eyes of the law, mace is non-lethal. But once you are incapacitated, what that person does to you will determine if your life is in jeopardy. If they try to harm you or take your gun, that is a different story. I'd shoot then. Personally, I would not want to be on trial for shooting someone who only maced me. But if I were a juror, I'd be forgiving. When maced you loose the ability to make sound judgement as your eyesight is compromised and you are having trouble breathing. Every situation is different and I'd be ready to shoot for sure.
     
  7. mesteve2

    mesteve2

    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2001
    Location:
    USA
    If someone gets their OC Pepper spray they are trained to shoot to Stop! (Kill).

    So deadly force is called for.

    :tongueout::tongueout::tongueout::tongueout::tongueout:
     
  8. Willard

    Willard Who, me?

    Messages:
    821
    Likes Received:
    179
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2000
    The question should be: Is an unprovoked physical attack / assault by a stranger justification for use of deadly force?
     
  9. AggiePhil

    AggiePhil ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Location:
    Texas
    Short answer: NO
     
  10. Blaster

    Blaster Hunc tu caveto

    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2000
    Location:
    Connecticut
    More specifically; the question is: Can you convince a jury of 12 people that your life was in jeopardy and any reasonable and prudent person would have taken the same action you did.
    If there is a doubt in your mind about convincing 12 jury members you should have family members start investing in soap on a rope for you.
     
  11. Puppy

    Puppy

    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    I'd say that'd depend on if the victim was in fear for their life.
     
  12. GlocknSpiehl

    GlocknSpiehl NRA Life Member

    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    866
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    It also depends on what state you live. I am sure I can articulate well enough to get no billed in FL.
     
  13. David Armstrong

    David Armstrong

    Messages:
    8,723
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2002
    Location:
    Lake Charles, LA

    That is the winner! The details of how the attack is being carried out don't matter under most circumstances, what matters is if the the attack rises to the level where deadly force can be used.
     
  14. packsaddle

    packsaddle

    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    88
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009

    And, remember, the average juror has an 8th grade level of education.
     
  15. jstutman

    jstutman

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    We just had a case a few months ago. A LEO shot and killed a suspect after the suspect sprayed mace in the officer's eyes and the officer felt the suspect was going after his gun. I think the case of deadly force depends on the situation
     
  16. KaosV

    KaosV

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    Washington
    Did you get sprayed yet?
     
  17. Misty02

    Misty02

    Messages:
    7,540
    Likes Received:
    2,927
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Location:
    Florida
    I would assume that someone that has sprayed me with mace is not considering inviting me to a cup of coffee. An unprovoked attack with mace will be viewed as the other person’s intent of incapacitating me to the point I’m unable to defend myself. Yes, I consider such an attack merits the use of deadly force. Whether or not I would respond with deadly force will greatly depend on the circumstances and who is around me at that time. If I happen to be with my granddaughter (she’s 3 years old) it is unlikely that I’ll consider shooting if I’m unable to clearly see my target. With older members of the family I know they would move out of the way and I would likely be more inclined to use deadly force. A lot of variables to consider on what I believe a likely response would be on my part. Nonetheless, I would still consider an unprovoked mace spray as an attack where deadly force is justified.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
     
  18. user

    user VaLegalDefense

    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Location:
    Va. and West Va.
    I assume you're making reference to the "self-defense/defense of others" doctrine. That defense does not require an attack amounting to deadly force, only the threat of "serious bodily injury". If you have a reasonable belief, based on objective fact, that you or an innocent third party is faced with the imminent threat of serious bodily injury or a serious felony (rape, robber, murder, burglary, arson), then you may respond with such force as is reasonably necessary, up to and including deadly force, to quell the attack. (At common law, that is, and I'm speaking here as a Virginia attorney.)

    If you have reason to believe that the mace or pepper spray is a precursor to (and thus part of) a robbery or threat of serious bodily harm, do what you need to do. Note also, that "fear for one's life", or any other emotional response, is completely irrelevant to the defense.

    Check this answer with an attorney where you live before accepting it as "gospel".
     
  19. Misty02

    Misty02

    Messages:
    7,540
    Likes Received:
    2,927
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Location:
    Florida
    I have a question. How do you separate “a reasonable belief of serious bodily injury” from what you mention is the emotional response “fear for one’s life”? I’m trying to separate the two in my mind and they seem to be intertwined.

    .<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
     
  20. user

    user VaLegalDefense

    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Location:
    Va. and West Va.
    They're not required to be separate; you may well be in fear for your life. But whether you have "fear" is legally irrelevant to the defense. That is to say, fear for your life, by itself is not enough, and killing an assailant without actually feeling fear ("in cold blood", as it were) may well be a good defense.