Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Rex Vallachorum, Sep 24, 2020.
No response yet.
No answer to this either.
Biden loves guns.
Did you come across some kind of "Gun Control Handbook" and are quoting your ideas from it?
All these talking points of yours are very tired and old, and have been debunked over and over and over again.
Do you have any original thoughts?
Do you understand the words: "Shall not be infringed" ?
Negative, Ghostrider. You're attacking the status quo, you hold the burden of proof.
Why do people build things they can buy or pay someone else to do?
Many times it is to see if they can.
As to the idea that only anti government type of criminals buy "80% receivers", that is silly. I would hazard an educated guess that 99.9% of the sales are to people who already legally own guns.
Criminals are generally opportunistic. To make the effort to machine a gun (and buy the gun, the drill press, bit, jigs, etc) is more effort than they want to put into being a criminal.
And the crazy calculating criminals that want to terrorize will put in the time and effort, but they want to spread terror. How many guns did the unibomber use? Yet he had a very long reign of terror. Or look at RAF (red army faction). How many guns did they use in their reign of terror? The weapon isnt the important part to these people; it is the fear they instill from never knowing when or where the next will occur. A 1% or 100% receiver makes no difference to them.
Time to put on my mod hat. Folks, ditch the name calling, and school yard insults. Argue the issue.
So, seeing as you've made multiple replies to posts that came after mine but not answered the question requoted above, can I conclude that you've still got nothing but your feels? Upon further reflection, I have another question (that you'll likely also ignore). Why do I need to prove to you that no 80% receiver was ever used in a crime? I never made such a claim. Did that 'prove me wrong' technique work in debate class?
Based on this thread, it seems that you excel at throwing things at the wall hoping that they'll stick, but when asked for any sort of backup for your reasoning, you try to redirect to the person asking, rather than being able to answer yourself.
And we are seeing terrorism in the USA right now. It is the BLM/communist/ANTIFA riots.
They are having mobs, and surrounding and assaulting people at restaurants, blocking streets and surrounding cars while pounding on them, etc so that they can scare middle America into giving in to their demands. What they dont realize is terrorism works for a short period, then people get mad and it goes against the terrorist movement.
Ollies930 will no longer be participating in this thread.
It's too bad but like you said before, leave them enough rope they'll hang themselves. It's all fun and games until the insults start.
The communists side
A lot of free education went on, civic lessons, by people who lives it. There's value here.
True to form for a Leftist, you resort to insults when you can't come up with arguments that can stand on their own merit.
And it's also typical of Leftists to join a gun forum and engage in arguments in favor of gun control where you can find plenty of people who will argue with you. This is why people are accusing you of being a Troll because trolls like to argue and stir the pot.
And the fact that you're involved with a thread titled, "Invitation for GTPI leftist trolls to read and comment on the The Biden-Harris Gun Control Plans" --is a pretty good indication of where your head is at. (see Illustration)
But no Liberal can win an argument in favor of gun control based on the facts because there is no factual evidence that gun control has ever been effective in reducing crime and there's actually more evidence that it's counter productive because it's used as a substitute for dealing with the problem of crime directly. The Assault Weapon Ban of 1994 was the perfect example of how gun control doesn't work and was proven to be a failure which was why it was allowed to expire.
Liberals cannot make the case for gun control using logic. They have to rely on manipulating people's emotions and using distortion of the facts and outright lies and repetition of those lies by a willing media until they're perceived as truth by an ill-informed public and blind followers of the Leftist big government agenda.
So is Evidence-Based Intervention just another name for Red Flag Laws?
Ccw in Chicago...I was being sarcastic.
I think the point sailed right over top of your head. Let me try and clear things up. Maybe if all you said happens we should USE the second amendment for it's ORIGINAL purpose and stop Fudding around.
The fbi uniform crime report.
Also thats pretty neat honestly. Thats alot of little tiny lead.
Anti-gun troll who doesn't know anything about guns and the 2nd Amendment, comes to this gun forum posing as a "licensed future ammo manufacturer" and spouts all the usual Mom Demands talking points for pages and pages.
The only thing people like him are manufacturing is lies.