Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by vote Republican, Sep 19, 2019.
I guess as long as he didn't promise to be more flexible after the election he should be ok.
It's on plenty of other sites. That's a random one I grabbed googling on my phone earlier.
Here's the Washington Times article, which site I usually avoid due to the cancer level of ads:
Hey, if you want use an example of how Obama behaved to justify it, go for it.
Obama didn't have to justify it
So the IGIC and DNI are at odds regarding whether the complaint meets the standards of an "urgent concern." If, as the DNI determined, it actually does not fall within that classification, why continue to stonewall the release of basic information to the congressional intelligence committees? That in itself has the appearance of an attempted suppression of damaging information, and will certainly be (is being?) reported as such.
I doubt such a thing is unprecedented, and I wonder how many such complainants have submitted similar issues of possible urgent concern during this, or any previous, administration. Might be more common than we realize.
Heard it was Trudeau on the phone. Trump was laughing at him, promising not to release anymore blackface photos lol!!
was he trafficking secret intel to china or kim uno ? this feels like there are deep state shadow government spies in the whitehouse ...I expect this type of bs to be repeated until the election is over, if they cant dig up enough to jail him with a fake dossier to spy on him then they will continue to dig till they hit gold...many in this government need to meet a jail cell or unemployment line
Is this going to be another Obama/Putin I'll be more flexible after the election, or is it to be more of a pallet of cash to Iran?
Or maybe more of uranium deal to Russia.
Well said. This carp is getting old.
Someone said something to someone.
Sent from my SM-T280 using Tapatalk
Well, comparing this to Obama again is your call, not mine.
There’s an SOP that interpreters and other intel staff monitor these calls. This isn’t a deep state wiretapping thing.
Good! Now, I speculate.
1. testimony about whateverinthehell it is has already been given today;
2. I have no way of knowing what was said until Committee Chairperson, Adam Schiff does a leak to the press;
3. I have no way of knowing the content, whether the content has been verified (by the Huffington Report or Inforwars - your pick, leftwing or rightwing conspiracy rag);
4. I can hear the chant now: "No more promises" (until an elected president of my political persuasion is installed in office).
Remember, the cardinal rules of any political opposition:
1. the political candidate of the other party must have never:
a. visited a bad country;
b. ever talked to a diplomat from a foreign country or ordinary citizen from a different country;
c. had discussions with any foreign diplomat unless Jim Acosta is personally present;
d. never had any aide ever speak to a foreigner without a stenographer and an FBI agent (whose notes are not discoverable) present.
2. read all the points under no.1
Then if so many people are listening why would he say something traitorous, illegal, whatever?
This sounds like so much other stuff that gets thrown at Trump because he is president and Hillary is not.
And I am not a fan of Trump. At some point you have to let it go and try harder to beat him.
So nothing really.
The TDS is bad here.
Who else thinks it was Bolton?
Someone who is unidentified makes an accusation which we don’t know what it is. At this point, end of discussion.
Senility? Who knows. He's let loose before.
Again, what he did could be relevant - we may or may not ever know. The fact that the acting DNI won't disclose it as required by law to Congress makes it look like a cover-up.
Does it not concern you that the intelligence community is still spying on the President?
This is what drives me nuts. The articles I have read are filled with conjecture. The facts are what you say they are as we know them now. Nothing more.