close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

How do you think SCOTUS will rule on gay "marriage"

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Drjones, Dec 8, 2012.

  1. Drjones

    Drjones

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2002
    Messages:
    6,157
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    CA, just outside the United States
    Please do not discuss the merits of gay "marriage" as that goes nowhere except thread lock.

    I'm curious to know how you people think SCOTUS will rule on the two gay "marriage" cases before it.

    My confidence in the court to give an unbiased and constitutional ruling is greatly diminished after the obamacare ruling, but there's always hope....
     
  2. TK-421

    TK-421

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,057
    Location:
    Pflugerville, TX
    There is no reason why they shouldn't rule it is as constitutional.

    It all comes down to one simple question.

    Should one American Citizen be able to marry another American Citizen. Answer that exact question yes or no. Don't worry about their gender, religion, race, sexual orientation, hair style, type of car they drive, nothing. Just base it on the fact that homosexuals are American Citizens, and they should be afforded the rights that other American Citizens can get, thanks to the fact that they're straight.

    The Declaration of Independence clearly states that all men are created equal. ALL men, not "All straight men are created equal and gay men are lesser citizens."
     

  3. hogfish

    hogfish Señor Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,510
    Likes Received:
    1,229
    Location:
    fl
    My money is on gay marriage will be ruled as costitutional; no to the 'defense of marriage'.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2012
  4. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't know anything about the two cases, and didn't know there were any before seeing this thread.

    If they rule against freedom now, it will take them a long time to fix it because they really don't like to change positions, stare decisis.
     
  5. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    34,969
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    not very likely that they will enforce the 10th amendment and leave it up to the states.
     
  6. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
  7. Bruce H

    Bruce H

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2000
    Messages:
    4,142
    Likes Received:
    921
    Location:
    missouri
    If they don't rule in favor of freedom they are lying SOB's that need removed from the bench.
     
  8. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Messages:
    13,286
    Likes Received:
    367
    Exactly wrong. The are (supposed to be) ruling on whether the two laws in questions are constitutional.

    EX: A lot of people think abortion is constitutional. It is not.

    The ruling in the matter was whether a law against it was legal as written. A law written later in a different fashion could adhere to COTUS principles and still outlaw it for some different reasoning or logic. As construed Roe v Wade did not meet that test.
     
  9. TK-421

    TK-421

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,057
    Location:
    Pflugerville, TX
    Yes they are supposed to be ruling on whether the two laws in question are constitutional, but they also have the option on keeping the california decision strictly in california, or making the decision affect the entire country. So they have the option of saying whether or not gay marriage is legal in the entire US, and not just in California.

    And to think of a group of people as lower class citizens just because of their sexual orientation is not only unconstitutional, but very discriminatory.
     
  10. snerd

    snerd Horselover Fat

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    18,593
    Likes Received:
    13,887
    Location:
    Oklahoma!
    They'll rewrite it as a tax. Problem solved.
     
  11. GAFinch

    GAFinch

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,943
    Likes Received:
    39
    Location:
    Georgia
    They've already ruled abortion and sodomy as unconstitutional even though they were both illegal when the Constitution was written, so they'll probably declare this legal also.
     
  12. Blast

    Blast 'nuff said

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Messages:
    16,574
    Likes Received:
    414
    Location:
    NKY/Cincinnati area
  13. Vic777

    Vic777

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    And that's true, then some Queer turns you! :rofl::rofl:
     
  14. W420Hunter

    W420Hunter

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,468
    Likes Received:
    100
    Location:
    Ohio
    There is a larger hidden issue hidden in this, and weather or not gay marriage is ruled constitutional or not the church will lose. What we really need to be asking is weather or not it is constitutional for the state to order the church to do or not do something that is inherently a religious institution. No matter who wins it invites the state to have power over the church. So how how any true conservative could be for this is something I can not grasp.
     
  15. AlexHassin

    AlexHassin

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Taiwan
    as far as i have heard, none of these rules say that a religious institution has to preform a wedding ceremony for anyone.
     
  16. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Staff Member Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2003
    Messages:
    16,164
    Likes Received:
    5,251
    If, as some insist, the government has no role in marriage, the SCOTUS *ought* to bump the matter down to the states and uphold (for instance) the CA state constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man-one woman.

    I doubt that an activist court will rule with such restraint.
     
  17. Ruble Noon

    Ruble Noon "Cracker"

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3
    This.
     
  18. fx77

    fx77 CLM

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,264
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    If it is anything like Obamacare..Roberts will say it is a civil right and vote for Gay Marriage
     
  19. Gunnut 45/454

    Gunnut 45/454

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    12,129
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well considering how they upheld Obamacare, I have zero confidence this court will side with our founders on the basic foundations of our country. We'll slip further into moral depravity. As to how it's constituional please someone show me where in the COTUS it say's anyone has a right to be married? Marriage is a religous right not a constitutional right! Never seen a Federal marriage license!!:rofl:

    Further more the only reason STATES got involved with marriage licensing was for taxing purposes! Then of course lawyers for money in devorce/property rights IE taxing!
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2012
  20. GAFinch

    GAFinch

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,943
    Likes Received:
    39
    Location:
    Georgia
    A church can be told to host a wedding reception, a religious school can be told to not teach traditional views on marriage and homosexuality, and religious adoption and foster care agencies can be told to offer services to gay couples. Don't mistake freedom of worship for freedom of religion.

    BTW, Democrats have already floated the idea of forcing military chaplains to perform same sex ceremonies.