Debate How Anthropology Disproves Noah's Flood

Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by Lone Wolf8634, Jun 29, 2017.

  1. Lone Wolf8634

    Lone Wolf8634 :):

    Messages:
    10,896
    Likes Received:
    1,895
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Location:
    Under the bus
  2. powernoodle

    powernoodle

    Messages:
    8,298
    Likes Received:
    23,847
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Location:
    secret underground bunker
    I don't do homework, so I did not watch the video. But there is a strong argument that the flood recounted in the Bible was regional rather than global. The OT writers repeatedly employed phraseology like "the whole world" as hyperbolic rather than literal. For example, we read that the whole world wanted an audience with Solomon. (1 Kings 10:24). But it is clear from the context that this should not be hyper-literalistic, but rather read in the context in which it was intended. That is, no one supposes that aboriginal natives from Australia and Eskimos were paddling their canoes to seek an audience with Solomon. Rather, the context tells us that everyone who knew of Soloman wanted to meet him. Similarly, we read in the New Testament that Paul was stirring up riots "all over the world". (Acts 24:5). Again, though, the context makes clear that Paul's message was meeting strong opposition from Jews wherever he went, not that Japanese or Peruvians were rioting.

    So, because words and phrases are equivocal rather than univocal (that is, they take on the meaning that the context allows rather than always having only one meaning), and because we read throughout the Bible that "the whole world" communicates regional rather than global scope, one may reasonably conclude that the flood was regional rather than global.

    Thanks.
     
    G30 Medic, SDDL-UP, bdcochran and 2 others like this.