close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Hidden Message in Supreme Court Opinions?

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Slackinoff, Jul 1, 2012.

  1. Slackinoff

    Slackinoff

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Texas
    Is there a hidden message in the Supreme Court Justice's opinions? Clue: What is not talked about is just as important as what is talked about...

    The hidden message in this post is that this is extra credit for my constitutional law class :tongueout: Undergrad class btw

    Do you guys have any rational theories?
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2012
  2. rgregoryb

    rgregoryb Amerikaner

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    8,506
    Likes Received:
    1,548
    Location:
    Republic of Alabama
    the problem with the theory of silence is that it is mostly speculation and open ended. Also there are way too many variables in the argument. One day I may want just vanilla ice cream, does that mean I don't like hot fudge?
     

  3. hogship

    hogship Patriot Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    13,302
    Likes Received:
    4,294
    Location:
    Northwest territory
    How about if YOU tell us what you think?

    I have a hard time believing there is a hidden message in Robert's opinion. This would be the same thing as the "Robert's is playing chess" arguments, and I don't buy into that, either.

    When discussing "legislating from the bench", there is plenty of speculation that certain opinions are contrary to law......or, the "spirit of the law". Everyone is free to have their own opinions about that, and I have mine. It is my opinion that Roberts made an incorrect decision which may end up being very costly for every American. He has his reasons for doing what he did, and I can't see any "hidden message" there.........do you?

    If you are a law student, you probably ought to start using a spell checker.......

    ooc
     
  4. Gunnut 45/454

    Gunnut 45/454

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    12,129
    Likes Received:
    9
    Yea the hidden message is 4 out the 9 justices really know how to interpet the COTUS as written. They don't read into any meaning except what it says! Take note law boy! It means exactly what it says nothing more nothing less!:steamed:
     
  5. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    34,969
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    You could do a pretty nice paper on Appeal to Ignorance.

    Making conclusions based on what was not said is not a smart move. It may simply be that it was not considered at this time.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2012
  6. Slackinoff

    Slackinoff

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Texas
    No, I am not a law student...btw what did I misspell?

    I should have mentioned that we are writing a paper over Miller V Alabama....Every one jumped on Obamacare...sorry.
    We are to discuss if it is a pragmatic interpretation, I have no problem with that....I am just super stumped at this Hidden theory
     
  7. Slackinoff

    Slackinoff

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Texas
    Thanks for the idea Doc, I like it.
     
  8. hogship

    hogship Patriot Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    13,302
    Likes Received:
    4,294
    Location:
    Northwest territory
    Messege

    OK, what hidden message theories have you heard?

    ooc
     
  9. countrygun

    countrygun

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    17,069
    Likes Received:
    27
    If you play it backwards at 33 1/3 it says "Paul is Dead"
     
  10. Slackinoff

    Slackinoff

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Texas
    Thanks,... I have heard of none....I can’t make an argument based on a "hidden" message according to the appeal to ignorance fallacy?
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2012
  11. Slackinoff

    Slackinoff

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Texas
    The appeal to ignorance really takes the wind out of any kind of hidden message theory......I am sure I will get the extra credit if I make the argument that these theories are a fallacy anyway
     
  12. hogship

    hogship Patriot Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    13,302
    Likes Received:
    4,294
    Location:
    Northwest territory
    Hey Slackinoff.......

    I just heard a "Robert's plays chess", or "hidden message" kind of thing on online radio......Dennis Prager show, if you've ever heard of him. Anyway, it's been proposed that Roberts' decision might rally the GOP vote and ultimately oust Obama at the polls this November. It really wasn't suggested that Roberts' had a hidden message, but I connected the dots after having your thread fresh on my mind. So........it could be theorized that Roberts ditched his responsibility to apply the Constitution in order to ultimately rid this country of Obama...........

    I don't believe any of that is true.......but, my fertile imagination stirred the pot, and thought it might be something you can write your paper on!.....:supergrin:

    ooc
     
  13. CAcop

    CAcop

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2002
    Messages:
    21,738
    Likes Received:
    4,258
    Location:
    California
    Was Kennedey blinking in Morse code when he read the dissent?
     
  14. hogship

    hogship Patriot Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    13,302
    Likes Received:
    4,294
    Location:
    Northwest territory
    OK, OK......you made me laugh! :rofl:

    ooc
     
  15. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    22,443
    Likes Received:
    4,087
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    If Roberts' decision was some kind of brilliant right-wing ploy then why didn't all the right-wing justices just vote the same way? Is Roberts playing the "bad guy"?

    I don't think he's that smart. Look how be flubbed the oath of office for Obama.
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2012
  16. Slackinoff

    Slackinoff

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Texas

    Hey thanks hog! Well I don’t have to write an entire paper on the subject. Our professor suggested that we write a little something about it for extra credit.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2012
  17. barbedwiresmile

    barbedwiresmile Unreconstructed

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,048
    Likes Received:
    55
    Location:
    Dixie

    :rofl::rofl::rofl: